Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

[Roy Clayton]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Hi Tuttsi

You may be interested to learn that Lowell tried to email me court papers to compy with a Civil Procedural Direction Notice from a Judge. The DN instructed them to give me all the information I had previously asked for under the Data Protection Act Section 7. I asked for the Direction and paid £45.00 because Lowell were not complying with my requests sent to them recorded delivery. They missed missed two deadlines imposed by the court so tried to email me the entire bundle 20 minutes before the third and final deadline the Judge imposed for striking them out. Although it was my Appeal they stated on the cover sheet that it was a 'Bankruptcy' hearing. They must have been on auto pllot sending out generic stencils. They emailed ten minutes later saying to ignore the first email and they sent another removing the reference to bankruptcy. The alleged debt which was disproved was £367.31.

[TUTTSI]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

it beggars belief that this company Lowells are still in existence - time to shake them up.

Did the judge award you with costs?

It was an abuse of the court process and it should never have gone that route to court.

If you have not been awarded costs I belive you can put in for a time order for costs http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...44770516,d.d2k

[bluebottle]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Would anyone like me to send an FOIA request to the OFT requesting the following information about Lowells -

1. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells;
2. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells, sufficiently serious enough to warrant imposing Requirements to their licence;
3. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells, sufficiently serious enough to warrant a Minded to Refuse Renewal or to Revoke;
4. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells, sufficiently serious enough to warrant a Determination to Refuse Renewal or to Revoke

in the last 12 months.

I am also inclined to ask them if a strike-out or court judgement against Lowells for misusing Statutory Demands is sufficient to put their licence at risk.

Let me know what you think.

[fuzzybrain]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

I'm happy to help in anyway I can and you can have any of the court papers relating to recent run in with Lowells x

[PlanB]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

That's an excellant idea BB :high5:

Do you need to restrict the FOIA request to the last 12 months or can it be the last 3 years because Lowells have been increasingly trigger happy with SDs since 2009 :typing: Also is there a way to find out the ratio of SDs to actual BRs to illustrate Lowells' abuse of the instrument?

[CleverClogs]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Also is there a way to find out the ratio of SDs to actual BRs to illustrate Lowells' abuse of the instrument?

To get such data, the Office of Faffing and Twaddling would need to be competent.

[PlanB]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Would anyone like me to send an FOIA request to the OFT requesting the following information about Lowells -

1. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells;
2. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells, sufficiently serious enough to warrant imposing Requirements to their licence;
3. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells, sufficiently serious enough to warrant a Minded to Refuse Renewal or to Revoke;
4. Number of Complaints, in total, made against Lowells, sufficiently serious enough to warrant a Determination to Refuse Renewal or to Revoke

Here's another one BB :cheer2:

http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...899#post330899

[TUTTSI]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Excellent idea BB x

[bluebottle]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Excellent idea BB x

Tuttsi,

It might not be a bad idea to get together ALL the recent abuses of SDs by Lowells against LB members, as well as those going back to 01/01/09, and submit details of them to OFT with the FOIA request. That way, OFT can see just how non-compliant Lowells are with the law. I'll run it past Cel and see if she's okay with it, seeing as she gave The Leeds Losers a good hard slap.

[PlanB]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

It might not be a bad idea to get together ALL the recent abuses of SDs by Lowells against LB members, as well as those going back to 01/01/09, and submit details of them to OFT with the FOIA request. That way, OFT can see just how non-compliant Lowells are with the law. I'll run it past Cel and see if she's okay with it, seeing as she gave The Leeds Losers a good hard slap.

Legal Beagles has 33,993 members so an appeal for information could be fruitful :bounce:

[bluebottle]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

PM sent to Cel. Just waiting for a reply.

[TUTTSI]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Cel maybe the bestest person to organise this BB as site admin she will certainly have good knowledge of many of the cases that she has handled. She will also be able to put up a notice where we can ask Lowell victims to contact us regarding the Lowells issuing of SD's especially where it is an abuse of process. The OFT must certainly see loads of complaints surely they must have broken every rule in the book by now.

Tuttsi,

It might not be a bad idea to get together ALL the recent abuses of SDs by Lowells against LB members, as well as those going back to 01/01/09, and submit details of them to OFT with the FOIA request. That way, OFT can see just how non-compliant Lowells are with the law. I'll run it past Cel and see if she's okay with it, seeing as she gave The Leeds Losers a good hard slap.

[ODC]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Brilliant idea.

[dogtired]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Yes please BB and include, as suggested others of the group!

[QCKate]

Re: Lowells and Statutory Demand threats

Dont forget the solicitors used by Criminowels, BW Legal, Mr Sean Barton. Theyre the ones who issue most of the SDs often with dodgy dates etc

QCK