Re: HSBC & D.G
DJ quoted from my Brandon Citation to HSBC solicitor who D.G. had not informed of my defence statement, I gave him a copy, then he had anticipated from earlier conversation at the last hearing and basically quote from White Book CPR rules (40.1) of civil procedures, as I had admitted in the 1st place the CPR I used was incorrect and the DJ said she had to agree then, I should of quoted another set aside CPR (14.1) (1), regarding admission., also Brandon was the claimant, and I was the defendant so CPR supersedes the judgment, the DJ on summing up said the CCJ stays, BUT STAYED for 2 months because the FOS are investigating a complaint from me, and to inform the court any deliberation, I had also pointed out having trouble with HSBC over SAR request timings as it should of been here fully by now.
Is this correct: CPR s can rule out judgments if the judgment is for a claimant BUT if you are a defendant the CPR over rules A Judgment???
Well looking at the FOS final letter just received,they state quote:- Whether a lender is able to produce the Original Credit Agreement may affect its enforceability . AS has been previously explained, this is more a matter for the court to consider than this service, which is an (INFORMAL FORUM), set up to look at what is fair and reasonable, not the strict application of the Law. Mr xxxxx is currently involved in legal proceedings regarding enforcement of this debt, and this is the more appropriate place for him to have this issue dealt with.>
The Bank is entitled to take action, they do not uphold complaint.
Now we know that the FOS is just an INFORMAL FORUM.!!!!!!
DJ quoted from my Brandon Citation to HSBC solicitor who D.G. had not informed of my defence statement, I gave him a copy, then he had anticipated from earlier conversation at the last hearing and basically quote from White Book CPR rules (40.1) of civil procedures, as I had admitted in the 1st place the CPR I used was incorrect and the DJ said she had to agree then, I should of quoted another set aside CPR (14.1) (1), regarding admission., also Brandon was the claimant, and I was the defendant so CPR supersedes the judgment, the DJ on summing up said the CCJ stays, BUT STAYED for 2 months because the FOS are investigating a complaint from me, and to inform the court any deliberation, I had also pointed out having trouble with HSBC over SAR request timings as it should of been here fully by now.
Is this correct: CPR s can rule out judgments if the judgment is for a claimant BUT if you are a defendant the CPR over rules A Judgment???
Well looking at the FOS final letter just received,they state quote:- Whether a lender is able to produce the Original Credit Agreement may affect its enforceability . AS has been previously explained, this is more a matter for the court to consider than this service, which is an (INFORMAL FORUM), set up to look at what is fair and reasonable, not the strict application of the Law. Mr xxxxx is currently involved in legal proceedings regarding enforcement of this debt, and this is the more appropriate place for him to have this issue dealt with.>
The Bank is entitled to take action, they do not uphold complaint.
Now we know that the FOS is just an INFORMAL FORUM.!!!!!!
Comment