• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Barclaycard's underhand tactics

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Barclaycard's underhand tactics

    Barclaycard's underhand tactics

    Andrew Ellson, Personal Finance Editor

    Bankers would struggle to work their way lower in most people's estimation at the moment, but managers at Barclaycard are giving it a jolly good go.
    Last week our Troubleshooter helped a woman who was unfairly charged a late-payment fee and interest on her credit card after Barclaycard unexpectedly moved forward the payment due date by nine days. The woman in question, like many Times Money readers, is diligent with her finances and usually pays her bill in full each month. She was understandably indignant and felt that she had been tricked into making a late payment. Sadly, after publishing her story, we discovered that she was not alone. In the past week we have been inundated with e-mails and letters from readers who have fallen victim to the very same tactic by Barclaycard.

    Not since British Gas introduced its woefully inadequate boiler breakdown cover or TalkTalk underestimated demand for its “free” broadband have we received so many letters on a single subject. The sheer scale of the correspondence suggests an orchestrated attempt by Barclaycard to confuse borrowers into missing their payment dates so that it can levy extra interest and charges. Worse still, to judge by the letters we have received, the lender appears to be targeting borrowers who usually clear their balances in full each month.

    Barclaycard's inadequate explanation is that it gives all customers a minimum of 20 days to pay from the date that a bill is generated, but that this payment window can be as many as 32 days. It says that the date can change because of weekends, Bank Holidays and, crucially, “operational expediency” - a vague notion that can only mean “whenever we wish to boost profits”. This is simply not good enough.
    Borrowers have a responsibility to check their bills, but it is misleading to vary payment dates so greatly and without justification. Many readers fell victim because they were on holiday when their bills arrived. We will forward the letters to Barclaycard and await its response. We call on it to reverse this policy, or at least make payment dates clearer on bills. Meanwhile, customers should consider whether they might receive a fairer deal elsewhere.
    Last edited by Amethyst; 27th September 2008, 09:45:AM.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

  • #2
    Re: Barclaycard's underhand tactics

    If you are caught out by Barclaycard effectively bringing forward the payment date by two weeks without informing you then claim back any interest and/or charges this makes you incur.

    Theres a few people who have consistently paid cards off each month not incurring interest have suddenly been whacked for those two weeks interest - nice little earner for barclaycard.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Barclaycard's underhand tactics

      It's a shame they're not sending the complaints off to the regulators.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Barclaycard's underhand tactics

        Tell them to
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Barclaycard's underhand tactics



          Barclaycard ad banned for exaggerating benefits


          by Staff, Campaign 24-Sep-08, 09:20
          LONDON - An ad for Barclaycard has been banned for misrepresenting the level of free insurance it offered.
          The ad, which featured a man handcuffed to a motel bed after having his possessions stolen, used the line: "Course if you had a Barclaycard all your fancy gadgets could have been insured - laptop, phone, new camera."





          Two viewers complained that the voiceover contradicted on-screen text, which explained that the deal only covered three gadgets, worth up to £500.

          A ruling by the Advertising Standards Authority today said: "We considered that the word 'all'... implied the insurance covered all gadgets, and was contradicted by the on-screen text that stated 'Maximum three gadgets totalling £500'."

          It added that most people would consider the combined value of a laptop, mobile phone and digital camera to exceed £500, and the ad implied a greater level of cover than was on offer.

          Barclaycard had attempted to argue that the phrase "all your gadgets could have been insured" was not an absolute claim that all gadgets would have been covered.
          #staysafestayhome

          Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

          Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X