Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

[jumper999]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

I wrote this on my site!!

I know that's where I copied it from LOL :tinysmile_kiss_t4:
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------

At last something I can agree whole heartedly with!:beagle:

Good that's a good start

[never-in-doubt]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

Yes but.

The DCA was the defendant not the claimant.
Vdr

as I spelled out numerous times, so why would you imply I said otherwise? I know full well that the debtor (consumer/Harrison) was the claimant and never suggested otherwise?

[Guest]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

I think it was M1 who asked if being at trial on the back of a faulty Dn/ termination represented abuse of process
i.e.
A Dn should have a date, being a date, when the debtor should rectify by
I have Dn's that state 17 days from the date of this notice

Clearly the Dn is faulty, when we get to court it will be on the back of a faulty DN
Is that abuse of process? The fact has already been pointed out to the OC

Hi
Iam by no means an expet in court procedings but wouldnt ther have to be some sort of intent involved in an abuse of process allegation.

Peter

[New_Age_Biker]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

Hi
Iam by no means an expet in court procedings but wouldnt ther have to be some sort of intent involved in an abuse of process allegation.

Peter

I have no idea Peter, thats why I asked

[volvodriver]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

I see you do not think a fault dn can be re presented Peter

Obfuscation from PB again.

I write very precise English

Please post up where I said that. And when you cant, dont put words into my mouth.

Vdr

[volvodriver]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

as I spelled out numerous times, so why would you imply I said otherwise? I know full well that the debtor (consumer/Harrison) was the claimant and never suggested otherwise?

I never implied anything of the sort.

If you actually care to look, I did not even respond to your post.

Perhaps you'd care to apologise.

Vdr

[Amethyst]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

I've really got no idea, but I cannot understand why a supposedly astute financial organisation shopuld be able to issue DN's until they get it right, and even after court proceedings have been issued, the right of issue of same which only arises after the issue of a DN which is in every respect correct.

I cannot accept that that is any sort of justice, its legal harrasment of the first order which cannot be right.

Vdr

Okay, I think that if a case is stayed on an occassion for a creditor to reissue a correct DN and they issue a 'bad notice' again, then the court would have less leniancy on them and then the abuse of process may well come into play and consider striking out their claim so they have to ask for permission for another shot.

I don't know any case where it has happened ?

And will you lot stop bickering it makes it very hard to follow the actual dicsussion on the subject.

[Guest]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

I've really got no idea, but I cannot understand why a supposedly astute financial organisation shopuld be able to issue DN's until they get it right, and even after court proceedings have been issued, the right of issue of same which only arises after the issue of a DN which is in every respect correct.

I cannot accept that that is any sort of justice, its legal harrasment of the first order which cannot be right.

Vdr

There it is

So you think that a default that is defective should be issued, or cannot be issued

Peter

[never-in-doubt]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

I never implied anything of the sort.

If you actually care to look, I did not even respond to your post.

Perhaps you'd care to apologise.

Vdr

You responded to Jumper, implying that the post she quoted suggested that the claimant was the DCA, which is why I responded because I wrote what jumper quoted!

I'm sorry, i'm sorry i'm able to understand quotes and follow a discussion in hand. :tinysmile_kiss_t4:

[Guest]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

Flippin Amy again she is so quick

This was the response to my post if you remember you told me to see Amys post here it is above.

Peter

[jumper999]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

Blimey this thread is turning in to a domestic, sorry for any confusion guys

[never-in-doubt]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

Blimey this thread is turning in to a domestic, sorry for any confusion guys

Domestic? What's one of those..... :tinysmile_aha_t:

This thread is intriguing, although I can understand why some posters are getting frustrated! I guess by the end of it we'll know every scenario possible, even without case law to refer to! We could call it LB Law....?

[Amethyst]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

lol not your fault jumper xx

For ref though it is an idea to reference stuff copied from elsewhere (just a link / posters name etc will do fine) xx

[never-in-doubt]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

lol not your fault jumper xx

For ref though it is an idea to reference stuff copied from elsewhere (just a link / posters name etc will do fine) xx

"Idiot from the orange place" - thats about right! :beagle:

[jumper999]

Re: Contracts, Termination, Repudiation and Rescission

Well PT's reputation does proceed him, he ignites a tiny spark and well the forest sets ablaze.

Great judgment, great result, and best of all a great guy.......that's our PT LOL.