Back in August I asked Natwest to transfer £7,250 to a friends Barclays account (in payment for a purchase). I had the correct Name and initials and a/c no. but got the branch and sort code wrong (I guessed the branch, the cashier looked up the sortcode), the transfer was sent to the a/c no. at the wrong branch.
When I asked the bank to repay the money, they contacted Barclays, who contacted the recipient, who has declined to refund the money.
Nat west have declined to repay the money(My fault for giving wrong branch),
The police say I should pursue Natwest or the recipient, not their problem, The Ombudsman has not responded.
I launched a small claim and cobbetts are acting but I have now reached the costly stage of £600 listing fee and running a risk of costs against me if I lose.
Do I have a case? Is their precedent? Or should I bale out now and pursue a case against Barclys for dislosure of recipient then an action against someone who may be a man of straw?
I don't mind being David, but am I a fool?
When I asked the bank to repay the money, they contacted Barclays, who contacted the recipient, who has declined to refund the money.
Nat west have declined to repay the money(My fault for giving wrong branch),
The police say I should pursue Natwest or the recipient, not their problem, The Ombudsman has not responded.
I launched a small claim and cobbetts are acting but I have now reached the costly stage of £600 listing fee and running a risk of costs against me if I lose.
Do I have a case? Is their precedent? Or should I bale out now and pursue a case against Barclys for dislosure of recipient then an action against someone who may be a man of straw?
I don't mind being David, but am I a fool?
Comment