• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    How will this affect your score?

    Will you count this as one "kill", or as two, or more?
    It must be at least two!!!

    QCK

    Comment


    • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

      Originally posted by Celestine View Post
      I'll play fair and count this as two


      We are now up to 6 Stat Demands against Lowell :caked:

      Thank You BMW...I've enjoyed every minute. xxx
      This is such briilant news. Can we apply to Criminowells to get some more?!!!!!????

      QCK

      Comment


      • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

        HA HA HA

        Comment


        • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

          I thought you'd enjoy that ODC xxx
          "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

          I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

          If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

          If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

          Comment


          • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

            Originally posted by QCKate View Post
            Can we apply to Criminowells to get some more?!!!!!????
            Like this?

            Dear Sir,

            Thank you for having served on me no fewer than three Statutory Demands for the same alleged debt that you know cannot be enforced and which Statutory Demands have consequently been quite easy to have set aside.

            My lawyers have really enjoyed playing with you and will doubtless enjoy even more receiving your payment for their services.

            However, I would like to state how excellent I found your stationery to be. Cut in half, it was more than adequately large. Admittedly, it was not very absorbent, but it was both strong enough to resist tearing and sufficiently flexible not to cause chafing. Best of all, the ink did not come off in use. I may never be entirely happy with Andrex ever again!

            Please send me some more letters or Statutory Demands, as soon as possible.

            Yours Faithfully,

            Clever Clogs

            Comment


            • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

              Originally posted by Celestine View Post
              I thought you'd enjoy that ODC xxx
              Can I claim Royalties for the use of my copyrighted name of "THE LEEDS LOSERS"

              Comment


              • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

                Originally posted by PlanB View Post
                Just use The Lamp Post like the rest of us

                aw:aw:
                aw: aw:

                Theres a Paws for thought?:tinysmile_kiss_t4:

                Comment


                • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

                  Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                  Like this?

                  Dear Sir,

                  Thank you for having served on me no fewer than three Statutory Demands for the same alleged debt that you know cannot be enforced and which Statutory Demands have consequently been quite easy to have set aside.

                  My lawyers have really enjoyed playing with you and will doubtless enjoy even more receiving your payment for their services.

                  However, I would like to state how excellent I found your stationery to be. Cut in half, it was more than adequately large. Admittedly, it was not very absorbent, but it was both strong enough to resist tearing and sufficiently flexible not to cause chafing. Best of all, the ink did not come off in use. I may never be entirely happy with Andrex ever again!

                  Please send me some more letters or Statutory Demands, as soon as possible.

                  Yours Faithfully,

                  Clever Clogs

                  Ha Ha Ha Thanks CleverClogs i love it i think i should send them one msl:

                  Comment


                  • Re: WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

                    :gossip: Ha Ha Ha update !! Kate has now confirmed that she has now successfully set aside all 3 SD's and the stoopid losers from leeds has agreed to pay all kate's costs :Cry: WOW ! and the costs are huge well done kate, fantastic it is now well and truly over phew !! :whoo:

                    Comment


                    • Re: WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

                      Originally posted by bmw2602 View Post
                      :gossip: Ha Ha Ha update !! Kate has now confirmed that she has now successfully set aside all 3 SD's and the stoopid losers from leeds has agreed to pay all kate's costs :Cry: WOW ! and the costs are huge well done kate, fantastic it is now well and truly over phew !! :whoo:
                      Until some threat monkey presses the button to send out No.4

                      Comment


                      • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

                        Hi everyone, do you remember this post from 2013 where celestine fought these statutory demands x 3 from lowells and won, well guess what they are back with the threat of court action if i dont pay up, if i remember correctly i think they gave up, even though i am still waiting for the cca request from years ago, any ideas on what i should do, take it seriously, not sure what to do any info would be great, thankyou

                        Comment


                        • Re: WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

                          tagging [MENTION=2]Celestine[/MENTION] for you ... she did it once, I'm sure she can again xx
                          Debt is like any other trap, easy enough to get into, but hard enough to get out of.

                          It doesn't matter where your journey begins, so long as you begin it...

                          recte agens confido

                          ~~~~~

                          Any advice I provide is given without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                          I can be emailed if you need my help loading pictures/documents to your thread. My email address is Kati@legalbeagles.info
                          But please include a link to your thread so I know who you are.

                          Specialist advice can be sought via our sister site JustBeagle

                          Comment


                          • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

                            They are able to take court action, however they still need to produce the CCA. Also because the SD's were set aside/withdrawn the clock continued ticking so if you hadn't had contact witht hem for 3 years before the SD's you may well be in a position to argue the debts are statute barred now. Any chance you can post a redacted copy of the letter?

                            I'll have a read back and see if Celestine can have a look too
                            #staysafestayhome

                            Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                            Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                            Comment


                            • Re: WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

                              Originally posted by April 2013
                              Lowells for a debt of just over £4k from four years ago from a catalogue
                              So had you had any contact in betweeny times ? 2009 to getting the Stat Demand?

                              i didnt sign any credit agreement, yes im pretty sure the account was opened before 2005
                              Another CCA request might be in order... but if it could be stat barred that might see them off quicker. I can't see on the thread who the original debt was, other than a catalogue - littlewoods?
                              #staysafestayhome

                              Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                              Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                              Comment


                              • Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

                                Originally posted by bmw2602 View Post
                                do you remember this post from 2013 where celestine fought these statutory demands x 3 from lowells and won, well guess what they are back with the threat of court action if i dont pay up, if i remember correctly i think they gave up, even though i am still waiting for the cca request from years ago
                                I remember reading your thread where they issued three SDs for the same debt didn't they?

                                They appear to have been set aside when they admitted that they couldn't produce the credit agreement. So unless they've suddenly found it there's not a lot they can do.

                                If they are still in a period of non compliance with your s. 77-79 CCA Request then nothing is gained by sending another, especially if that encourages them to try harder to reconstitute one.

                                I'd wait to see what [MENTION=2]Celestine[/MENTION] says.

                                It may be they need to be reminded of the past. Have you kept your file on this matter?

                                Di

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X