• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Marston Fees - does this sound right?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

    Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
    Indolent and ignorant. Apart from shooting people every few years, one might wonder what good the Sussex Police Farce does.
    I have been at a fake chemical decontamination this evening (emergency service training). There were lots of police there drinking tea and looking decorative. Not entirely sure what they did other than that though!

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

      Originally posted by jtwinkle View Post
      You were right, Police say the bailiffs have done nothing that requires a criminal investigation, they are just 'misbehaving'. They just asked me to report to trading standards, which I have done via the Citizens Advice Consumer helpline, who also advised me to speak to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
      Sussex Police needs disbanding, along with City of London Police. If Marstons were claiming only lawful fees, then, it might be just "misbehaving", but, in this case, it involves a bailiff extorting more than the law permits. I have the email address of Marston's CEO if you would like me to PM it to you.

      gareth.hughes@marstongroup.co.uk

      Oh dear. I wonder how it suddenly appeared in this post? :grin:
      Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

        Originally posted by jtwinkle View Post
        I have been at a fake chemical decontamination this evening (emergency service training). There were lots of police there drinking tea and looking decorative. Not entirely sure what they did other than that though!
        Farted loudly, scratched their groins and generally got in the way. :grin:
        Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

          Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
          Sussex Police needs disbanding, along with City of London Police. If Marstons were claiming only lawful fees, then, it might be just "misbehaving", but, in this case, it involves a bailiff extorting more than the law permits. I have the email address of Marston's CEO if you would like me to PM it to you.

          gareth.hughes@marstongroup.co.uk

          Oh dear. I wonder how it suddenly appeared in this post? :grin:
          Oh dear however did that happen! Will write him an email in the morning, I can't believe they are allowed to get away with this. It will be nice to let him know every agency I've reported them to today.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

            Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
            I have the email address and phone numbers of Marston's CEO if you would like me to PM it to you.

            gareth.hughes@marstongroup.co.uk
            Telephone : 01992 703744
            Mobile: 07834 748192
            I've fixed your post for you.

            Oh dear. I wonder how it suddenly appeared in this post? :grin:
            Indeed.

            Wouldn't it be a pity if some mischievous person were to put those 'phone numbers on a 'tart card' and leave it in the loos of gay pubs as being a bum-hole for hire? msl:

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

              Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
              I've fixed your post for you.


              Indeed.

              Wouldn't it be a pity if some mischievous person were to put those 'phone numbers on a 'tart card' and leave it in the loos of gay pubs as being a bum-hole for hire? msl:
              OUCH ?) A right pain in the bum, bet he changes his mobile quick smart.

              However he must be told that his bailiffs are out of control, and he could end up in the dock with them.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                Originally posted by jtwinkle View Post
                Oh dear however did that happen! Will write him an email in the morning, I can't believe they are allowed to get away with this. It will be nice to let him know every agency I've reported them to today.
                Including the fact that DVLA are well p*ssed-off with them over the clamp? :grin:
                Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                  Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post

                  Wouldn't it be a pity if some mischievous person were to put those 'phone numbers on a 'tart card' and leave it in the loos of gay pubs as being a bum-hole for hire? msl:
                  Naughty Cloggy! :grin:
                  Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                    Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                    Is the vehicle signwritten, i.e. has some form of advertising on it showing it is used for trade purposes? Also, does your husband's motor insurance cover business use?

                    The fees are way out of what they should be. it looks as if the bailiff was reading The Brothers' Grimm Book of Bailiff Fees when he wrote up the account.

                    The fees should be as follows -

                    PCN + Court Fee = £82.00
                    Letter Fee = £11.20
                    Attend to Levy on £93.20 = £28.00
                    Attend to Remove/Removal Costs = £0.00 because the disingenuous so-and-so didn't remove
                    VAT on £39.20 @ 20% = £7.84
                    Total = £129.04

                    By my calculations, the bailiff has overcharged by some £302.05. Let other Beagles look in and check my calculations, but I am pretty sure you have been grossly overcharged.
                    On the VAT bit should it be VAT on £93.20 instead of £39.20?? Therefore £18.64 instead of £7.84?

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                      Originally posted by jtwinkle View Post
                      On the VAT bit should it be VAT on £93.20 instead of £39.20?? Therefore £18.64 instead of £7.84?
                      Let me explain -

                      PCN + Court Fee = £82.00 Exempt from VAT
                      Letter Fee = £11.20 Subject to VAT @ 20%
                      Attend to Levy on £93.20 = £28.00 Subject to VAT @ 20%
                      Attend to Remove/Removal Costs = £0.00 because the disingenuous so-and-so didn't remove
                      VAT on £39.20 @ 20% = £7.84
                      Total = £129.04

                      Any bailiff or bailiff company caught adding VAT to fines and/or court costs is asking to get a visit from HMRC as that amounts to VAT Fraud.
                      Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                        Thanks for your help
                        Last edited by jtwinkle; 20th February 2014, 13:24:PM. Reason: Changed the numbers

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                          Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                          Let me explain -

                          PCN + Court Fee = £82.00 Exempt from VAT
                          Letter Fee = £11.20 Subject to VAT @ 20%
                          Attend to Levy on £93.20 = £28.00 Subject to VAT @ 20%
                          Attend to Remove/Removal Costs = £0.00 because the disingenuous so-and-so didn't remove
                          VAT on £39.20 @ 20% = £7.84
                          Total = £129.04

                          Any bailiff or bailiff company caught adding VAT to fines and/or court costs is asking to get a visit from HMRC as that amounts to VAT Fraud.
                          Thank you for explaining! So £303.05 overcharged.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                            JT.

                            Sending you a PM.
                            Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                              Originally posted by bluebottle View Post

                              Any bailiff or bailiff company caught adding VAT to fines and/or court costs is asking to get a visit from HMRC as that amounts to VAT Fraud.
                              Don't follow what you mean.

                              As VAT on Fines & Penalties is not reclaimable there is no need for the Bailiff to produce a VAT receipt in the manner we are accustomed to seeing.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Marston Fees - does this sound right?

                                Originally posted by ploddertom View Post
                                Don't follow what you mean.

                                As VAT on Fines & Penalties is not reclaimable there is no need for the Bailiff to produce a VAT receipt in the manner we are accustomed to seeing.
                                The VAT they charge on the exempt portion is allegedly a thrutch (fiddle) that ends up in the bailiffs back pocket with no record to the VAT man.

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X