• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

rossendale bailiffs

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: rossendale bailiffs

    Council added the £95

    Comment


    • Re: rossendale bailiffs

      Originally posted by louisejane View Post
      Council added the £95
      Whilst the council may have added it, who informed that they had and when did who told you they had tell you? If it was Rossendales, after they had written to you initially, that is suspect and needs further investigation.
      Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

      Comment


      • Re: rossendale bailiffs

        And council informed me of those costs f

        Comment


        • Re: rossendale bailiffs

          It was on there final notice
          Ive read online they can only charge £3 for taking you to court is that correct?

          Comment


          • Re: rossendale bailiffs

            Getting a local authority to admit they overcharged when obtaining a liability order is likely to be more than slightly difficult.

            Moving on, can you say how many times the bailiff visited each address - and when?

            (If he had only visited once before his "levy", he should not have charged for the second visit.)

            Comment


            • Re: rossendale bailiffs

              The levy is not worth the wasted paper is written on!

              Laptop, no model no serial number not even a colour, besides, unless the bailif carries with him some proprietary software to clear the hard drive of all information stored, it can not be taken because of the date that could be covered by the DPA.

              The above applies to the phone as well.
              The Black rat (Rattus rattus) is a common (hence the accusation of being Pleb) long-tailed rodent of the genus Rattus (rats) in the subfamily Murinae (murine rodents). The species originated in tropical Asia and spread through the Near East in Roman times (another thing that we ought to thanks the Romans for, besides roads, aqueducts and public toilets) before reaching Europe by the 1st century and spreading with Europeans across the world.

              A mutation of the beast now comes black leather clad, riding a motorcycle that looks like a battenbergh cake on wheels.

              A skilled predator, totally ruthless with it's prey, but also known to be extremely generous in doling out tickes that can provide points for motorists who want to downsize from mechanically propelled vehicles to bycicles.



              It's a dirty job, but someone got to do it!

              My opinions are free to anyone who wishes to make them theirs, but please be advised that my opinions might change without warning once more true facts are ascertained

              Comment


              • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                Originally posted by Sir Vere Brayne d'Emmidge View Post
                The levy is not worth the wasted paper is written on!

                Laptop, no model no serial number not even a colour, besides, unless the bailif carries with him some proprietary software to clear the hard drive of all information stored, it can not be taken because of the date that could be covered by the DPA.

                The above applies to the phone as well.
                If the bailiff were to delete the data at the scene whilst taking the laptop or at any time until just prior to sale he may well be guilty of the offence of Criminal Damage, as a debtor may redeem the goods Police are also guilty if they delete images or footage from a camera on a stop and search or at a doorstep when the bailiff is filmed as the MET found out to their cost.

                Comment


                • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                  I discussed this with rossendales they said they'd have to get an outside company to remove all data and therefore incur further cost's
                  Im pretty much fighting a losing battle
                  I visisted citizens advice yest and they couldn't help
                  Iv emailed rossendales stating i dont agree with charges
                  Ive to ring bailif personally today hopefully to sort out a payment plan
                  I dont want to give in and pay but looks as though its my only option to keep the tosser away :'(

                  Comment


                  • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                    Originally posted by louisejane View Post
                    I discussed this with rossendales they said they'd have to get an outside company to remove all data and therefore incur further costs
                    That, frankly, is utter nonsense.

                    Im pretty much fighting a losing battle
                    You will be if you try attacking them from the front - you have to outflank the buggers!

                    I visisted citizens advice yest and they couldn't help
                    Citizens' Advice Bureaux can be useful or can be useless - it largely depends on the sort of volunteers they get.

                    Iv emailed rossendales stating i dont agree with charges
                    I rather doubt that they'll lose much sleep over that.

                    Ive to ring bailif personally today hopefully to sort out a payment plan
                    Why do you want the bugger to help himself to even more of the money you're trying to pay the council?

                    He'll probably charge a "Removal/van fee" every time he comes out for a payment - so that will be £160 added to the debt, every time!

                    I dont want to give in and pay but looks as though its my only option to keep the tosser away :'(
                    So pay the remaining money directly to the council, as soon as possible.

                    Comment


                    • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                      Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                      That, frankly, is utter nonsense.


                      You will be if you try attacking them from the front - you have to outflank the buggers!


                      Citizens' Advice Bureaux can be useful or can be useless - it largely depends on the sort of volunteers they get.


                      I rather doubt that they'll lose much sleep over that.


                      Why do you want the bugger to help himself to even more of the money you're trying to pay the council?

                      He'll probably charge a "Removal/van fee" every time he comes out for a payment - so that will be £160 added to the debt, every time!


                      So pay the remaining money directly to the council, as soon as possible.
                      Totally agree with you, Cloggy. By doing this, the OP only pays what lawful fees are due to Rossendales. As long as they make it clear to the council they are lawful fees and that Rossendales are told that their lawful fees have been paid to the council and they should apply to them for payment, all well and good. However, if Rossendales come back, throwing their weight about and demanding unlawful fees, the OP's OH should not hesitate to remove whoever turns up with the toe of their boot.
                      Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                      Comment


                      • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                        Originally posted by bizzybob View Post
                        If the bailiff were to delete the data at the scene whilst taking the laptop or at any time until just prior to sale he may well be guilty of the offence of Criminal Damage, as a debtor may redeem the goods Police are also guilty if they delete images or footage from a camera on a stop and search or at a doorstep when the bailiff is filmed as the MET found out to their cost.
                        Interesting. Please enlighten me about the Met's act of stupidity, BB.
                        Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                        Comment


                        • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                          Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                          Totally agree with you, Cloggy. By doing this, the OP only pays what lawful fees are due to Rossendales. As long as they make it clear to the council they are lawful fees and that Rossendales are told that their lawful fees have been paid to the council and they should apply to them for payment, all well and good. However, if Rossendales come back, throwing their weight about and demanding unlawful fees, the OP's OH should not hesitate to remove whoever turns up with the toe of their boot.
                          louisejane has already paid money to the Rottendales spiv and they, of course, have deducted their fees (lawful and reasonable, or unlawful and/or unreasonable) before handing on a tiny amount to the council. As I see it, she doesn't owe the bästärd bailiff anything except, perhaps, an irredeemable curse on him and all his crotchspawn.

                          Comment


                          • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                            Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                            louisejane has already paid money to the Rottendales spiv and they, of course, have deducted their fees (lawful and reasonable, or unlawful and/or unreasonable) before handing on a tiny amount to the council. As I see it, she doesn't owe the bästärd bailiff anything except, perhaps, an irredeemable curse on him and all his crotchspawn.
                            Thank you for clarifying that, Cloggy. All we need to do now is calculate what lawful fees Rossendales are due, what the OP has paid and to what extent Rossendales have ripped-off the local authority. There is likely to be a clause in the contract between Rossendales and the OP's local authority that Rossendales account for all monies received. If the OP's local authority is following proper governance and scrutiny procedures, they should conduct a random audit. The sad fact is, local authority posts are being cut - a local authority near to me is planning to cut 300 posts - and one of the first things to suffer is proper governance and scrutiny. The OP needs to badger their ward councillors to have their case subject to audit and scrutiny. Unless the councillors are complicit, they should do what they are elected to do and that is hold council officers to account and contractors, too. Reminding the councillors of their liability under the HRA and that of their contracted enforcement agents might focus their minds.
                            Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                            Comment


                            • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                              Try these for size BB
                              The MET were using S44 Terrorism Act to harass photographers and Japanese tourists taking pictures of things like Nelsons Column, a schoolboy was assaulted by police by being pushed down steps whilst filming a parade


                              http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...update-12-05pm
                              http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...k-breaking-law

                              http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...cer-blasts-met

                              http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/12..._police_rules/

                              http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...re-a-nightmare

                              http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...mplaint-update

                              http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...eep-them-handy

                              And the list goes on

                              Comment


                              • Re: rossendale bailiffs

                                Originally posted by CleverClogs View Post
                                louisejane has already paid money to the Rottendales spiv and they, of course, have deducted their fees (lawful and reasonable, or unlawful and/or unreasonable) before handing on a tiny amount to the council. As I see it, she doesn't owe the bästärd bailiff anything except, perhaps, an irredeemable curse on him and all his crotchspawn.
                                No the bailiff owes her the difference between 2 visit fees and his outrageous fleecing, which he should forward to the council to allocate against her debt forthwith, or may he suffer from an indescribably irritating crotch-itch or a rotting cordwangle.

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X