Hello there everyone, Another of my little queries.
As those of you who are kind enough to read my posts know I have several outstanding laibility orders for Ct .
'The first two these are secured by levies on a vehicle, which has bereen scrapped. On the third there is no levy.
At the moment I am paying £125 per month to cover these and paying the council £80 forthis years CT.
The bailiff ccompany are saying that they cannot enter into an arragement for the third LO as they do not have a levy . B ailliff turns up every two weeks and shoves a notice of removal through the door . They cant levt my current cars one is on Hp and the other is a blue badge holders vehicle. Anyway the valu of both is little more than a thousand pounds, even if sold privately.
My main question is does the code of practice for enforcement agents require them to come to an arrangement without a levy ? Am I correct in assuming that the only lawful charges they can make on the third LO is one first and one second visit fee.
As those of you who are kind enough to read my posts know I have several outstanding laibility orders for Ct .
'The first two these are secured by levies on a vehicle, which has bereen scrapped. On the third there is no levy.
At the moment I am paying £125 per month to cover these and paying the council £80 forthis years CT.
The bailiff ccompany are saying that they cannot enter into an arragement for the third LO as they do not have a levy . B ailliff turns up every two weeks and shoves a notice of removal through the door . They cant levt my current cars one is on Hp and the other is a blue badge holders vehicle. Anyway the valu of both is little more than a thousand pounds, even if sold privately.
My main question is does the code of practice for enforcement agents require them to come to an arrangement without a levy ? Am I correct in assuming that the only lawful charges they can make on the third LO is one first and one second visit fee.



Comment