Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

[Milly29]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Thankyou Cleverclogs, much appreciated. I shall give it a read before I write my kick-ass letters!! Thanks again x

[ploddertom]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Councils use Bailiffs as first line of enforcement as they are perceived to be a no cost option. To do any other means the Council incurs extra admin costs. Unfortunately most Councils are heavily blinkered and turn a blind eye to what actually goes on until it comes back to bite them on the Arrass. Fighting this is not an overnight thing and may take a while to resolve but you do have to persevere.

[Milly29]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Thnks Ploddertom. I intend to persevere, regardless of the time it takes. I will keep you updated. Thanks again x

[CleverClogs]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Councils use Bailiffs as first line of enforcement as they are perceived to be a no cost option. To do any other means the Council incurs extra admin costs.

Do you mean that no council has ever received any "commission" from a bailiff company?

[pepsie]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Do you mean that no council has ever received any "commission" from a bailiff company?

If you care to read PT's post carefully, you can then answer your own question...

[CleverClogs]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

If you care to read PT's post carefully, you can then answer your own question...

PT stated that the reason for the use of bailiffs is a mistaken view that they are a "no cost" option.

The Lader white paper, which I attached to post #15, seems to suggest that some councils may (directly or otherwise) derive another income stream from the bailiff company appointed to enforce debts. Is that white paper wrong?

[pepsie]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

CC please read the post again ...PT stated they are perceived to be a 'no cost' option. If you want to discuss the Lader report then I suggest you start a new thread as it is not directly related to the comment in post #17.

[CleverClogs]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Whatever...

[enquirer]

Re: Bristow and Sutor.......again!!!!!

Thankyou Cleverclogs .No, stupidly I didnt send the letter........only because I had a telephone conversation with the council that was the same as the letter and soI didnt think the letter would be neccessary.

A paper trail is always necessary.