phillips using dvcv act

[Guest]

Re: phillips using dvcv act

It also means that the council has engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the debtor.

As the white paper says it clearly contraviens the guidlines. Its the whole bank charge thing again, the least able to pay are mugged by the system.

You would think that tenders would go to those companies that providing the best quality of service, not the case,
The perfect enviroment of greed for the mr Boasts of this world to flourish.

Peter

[CleverClogs]

Re: phillips using dvcv act

As the white paper says it clearly contraviens the guidlines. Its the whole bank charge thing again, the least able to pay are mugged by the system.

It's far, far worse than that - the inflated fees are not supported by any law or regulation and, if councils tacitly allow bailiffs to charge those excessive/unlawful fees, they may have committed the (indictable) criminal offence of conspiracy to defraud.

You would think that tenders would go to those companies that providing the best quality of service, not the case,
The perfect enviroment of greed for the mr Boasts of this world to flourish.

Again, it is worse, as it seems designed to reward criminal activity.

[charitynjw]

Re: phillips using dvcv act

It also is worth mentioning that the local authority, re council tax, have already at this stage taken the debtor to 'court', obtained a liability order, & have had a good slice of that action.