• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Traffic Violation

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Traffic Violation

    Absolutely right Leclerc - if you look at the final bit of post 6 I've said I'll ask them to scan the ticket and send it to me so that it is clear what sort of ticket it is. In this case, it is not as simple as asking them over the phone unfortunately.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Traffic Violation

      Originally posted by Caspar View Post
      The Road Traffic Act quoted in the link you provided is what allows these contraventions to be non-criminal.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Traffic Violation

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Traffic Violation

          Hi casper I found this site very very helpful when I got a ticket which involved the court but later I won and did nothave to pay.........don't know if someone already has posted it but for future it is a very good forum with some very good advice from many.

          Good luck

          FightBack Forums

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Traffic Violation

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Traffic Violation

              What's the plan for dealing with the bailiffs and Council Tax? Might be useful for others in the same/similar situation to follow.
              Is no longer here

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Traffic Violation

                I can't answer that just yet as the person concerned gets very muddled and at the moment we're still in the process of clarifying things regarding the magistrates' court fine as clearly this is a priority.

                There is the obvious issue of overcharging on the CT side of things, this apparently is for a visit to levy, but as no levy took place it should obviously be the normal first visit charge. I think the main problem here is the apparent unwillingness of the bailiffs to accept a reasonable offer. She'll be writing to the Head of Revenues pointing out the overcharging and the council's vicarious liability with their appointed agents, their refusal to enter into a repayment plan and it will be interesting to see the reply to that letter.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Traffic Violation

                  The magistrates court fine, if it is a magistrates court fine, which hasn't been clarified yet, is indeed a priority, but then again so is council tax. Is she up to date with the current year's council tax?
                  If the fine turns out to be civil not criminal, then priorities will have to be revisited, I would think. Whilst it's not an offence to be unable to pay, the council tax will have to be paid in the end. A SAR to the bailiffs would be in order, as well as a letter of complaint regarding their overcharges.
                  Is no longer here

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Traffic Violation

                    If she has proof of the £120 charges (and I know as things are it's an if so not ideal), then I can see no reason to SAR them. A letter of complaint will be being sent to the council as mentioned complaining about the charges and their appointed agents refusal to accept installments. It's very difficult until we hear back to post anything more definitive for people to help on.

                    As soon as I hear anything back I'll post up.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Traffic Violation

                      If she has proof of the charges she still needs to complain to the bailiffs themselves, not just the council, copying both parties into each letter. Once the bailiffs realise they have been "grassed up" to the council, this generally tends to result in a (downwards) review of the charges.
                      Is no longer here

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Traffic Violation

                        Hi Caspar,

                        Re CT, could you try LGFA 13a?

                        http://www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/services..._discount.aspx
                        CAVEAT LECTOR

                        This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

                        You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
                        Cohen, Herb


                        There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
                        gets his brain a-going.
                        Phelps, C. C.


                        "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
                        The last words of John Sedgwick

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Traffic Violation

                          Some useful advice on this thread Caspar. I hope it resolves things for you.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Traffic Violation

                            Hi everyone. I have just had a call from the police saying that my parked car had caused an accident. It was parked fifty feet from the nearest junction on a straight part of the road with no markings on it. The policeman stated that he can either give me a warning over the phone or visit me with a £60 fine and points (my choice). He then said that I could park there but not at busy times. Surly it's the fault of the other drivers and not my car.
                            Anyone else had the same problem.
                            Cheers M

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Traffic Violation

                              Was the person on the 'phone really a plod or was it one of your chums winding you up?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Traffic Violation

                                How did this work out in the end, Caspar?
                                Is no longer here

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X