• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Lloyds Bank plc v Voller

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lloyds Bank plc v Voller

    TC found this for me

  • #2
    Re: Lloyds Bank plc v Voller

    THANKYOU Xxx
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Lloyds Bank plc v Voller

      Very interesting is paragraph 16(can we have discussion on this case perhaps separate to this thread?):

      "16. Mr Voller before us today reiterated the point, made on paper and through counsel to the judge, that he had not
      received that documentation. It is a point about which he feels strongly. Whilst, for my part, I have to say that in my
      judgment the judge was entitled to make the findings which he made on the balance of probabilities, I hope it is of some
      consolation to Mr Voller that speaking for myself those findings are in no sense essential to the outcome of this case or
      the decision which the law obliges me to reach. In my judgment, the position is very simple and well established as a
      matter of banking law and practice. It is this. If a current account is opened by a customer with a bank with no express
      agreement as to what the overdraft facility should be, then, in circumstances where the customer draws a cheque on the
      account which causes the account to go into overdraft, the customer, by necessary implication, requests the bank to
      grant the customer an overdraft of the necessary amount, on its usual terms as to interest and other charges. In deciding
      to honour the cheque the bank, by implication, accepts the offer. It is plain that the account in question, the personal
      account, operated for a very substantial period of time, with cheques being drawn by Mr Voller on the overdrawn
      account, and the cheques being honoured by the bank. Thus, the only proper conclusion which can be drawn, in the
      absence of any evidence that there was a different agreement between Mr Voller and the bank, is that the bank granted
      him overdraft facilities at the standard rate for overdrafts. It would have been open to the bank to have charged him the
      unauthorised rate but it did not do so."

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Lloyds Bank plc v Voller

        On this thread Nats Lloyds response letter - Legal Beagles
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X