TC found this for me
Lloyds Bank plc v Voller
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Lloyds Bank plc v Voller
THANKYOU Xxx#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
-
Re: Lloyds Bank plc v Voller
Very interesting is paragraph 16(can we have discussion on this case perhaps separate to this thread?):
"16. Mr Voller before us today reiterated the point, made on paper and through counsel to the judge, that he had not
received that documentation. It is a point about which he feels strongly. Whilst, for my part, I have to say that in my
judgment the judge was entitled to make the findings which he made on the balance of probabilities, I hope it is of some
consolation to Mr Voller that speaking for myself those findings are in no sense essential to the outcome of this case or
the decision which the law obliges me to reach. In my judgment, the position is very simple and well established as a
matter of banking law and practice. It is this. If a current account is opened by a customer with a bank with no express
agreement as to what the overdraft facility should be, then, in circumstances where the customer draws a cheque on the
account which causes the account to go into overdraft, the customer, by necessary implication, requests the bank to
grant the customer an overdraft of the necessary amount, on its usual terms as to interest and other charges. In deciding
to honour the cheque the bank, by implication, accepts the offer. It is plain that the account in question, the personal
account, operated for a very substantial period of time, with cheques being drawn by Mr Voller on the overdrawn
account, and the cheques being honoured by the bank. Thus, the only proper conclusion which can be drawn, in the
absence of any evidence that there was a different agreement between Mr Voller and the bank, is that the bank granted
him overdraft facilities at the standard rate for overdrafts. It would have been open to the bank to have charged him the
unauthorised rate but it did not do so."
- 2 likes
Comment
-
#staysafestayhome
Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.
Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Court Claim ?
Guides and LettersSHORTCUTS
Pre-Action Letters
First Steps
Check dates
Income/Expenditure
Acknowledge Claim
CCA Request
CPR 31.14 Request
Subject Access Request Letter
Example Defence
Set Aside Application
Witness Statements
Directions Questionnaire
Statute Barred Letter
Voluntary Termination: Letter Templates
A guide to voluntary termination: Your rights
Loading...
Loading...
Comment