Lloyds Classic Credit Card 2004

[Amethyst]

[Amethyst]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

[nemesis45]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

Is that intended to be a valid recon agreement??:tung:

[Amethyst]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

Is that intended to be a valid recon agreement??:tung:

No , I believe it is meant to be a copy of the original. There are a number of terms missing that are referred to.

[nemesis45]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

Hi Amethyst,

It would not satisfy either a CCA request nor be sufficient to rely upon in court it's useless but that's my opinion after reading if that's the appropriate word more a case of deciphering with little success.
Easily legible no.

nem.

[Amethyst]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

I agree with you xx Just need the most up to date arguments on legibility really.

[nemesis45]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

If I was presented with those documents in court acting in any capacity I would be more than a trifle angry to say the least!!
nem.

[Amethyst]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

They are from endlessnine's thread - we're working on a Witness Dattement to go in tmw so any input very welcome. Ta xx

[nemesis45]

Re: Restons Cabot Lloyd ccj

I think it has to be basic and simple the document (s) provided are not easily legible in all parts, and it cannot be confirmed that the alleged agreement and it's attachments are those relating to the alleged debt.
The simpler the better imo.

nem