Thankyou
Link financial
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Hi there ive now had a response from Link that makes no sense to me and im unsure how to proceed your help is appreciated
It says after reviewing the account they confirm its not statue barred as legal action was taken against Mr Acott (unsure who this is) on the 14th june 2011 so the account can never be statue barred so to set up an affordable payment plan
How do i proceed with this please
Comment
-
There letter also states that there policy is to cease contact with customers if no acknowledgement of the debt and no payment has been made in the limitation period i have never paid anything or acknowledged it in any way and have no idea who mr Acott is
Comment
-
It does sound like they are making stuff up.Originally posted by Forncett View PostThere letter also states that there policy is to cease contact with customers if no acknowledgement of the debt and no payment has been made in the limitation period i have never paid anything or acknowledged it in any way and have no idea who mr Acott is
You could send a SAR request to link, see if they correct the Mr. Acott or stick with it. Make sure you get Proof of Postage. You really want to find out what is what.
https://legalbeagles.info/library/gu...ccess-request/
In any case you can / should lodge a formal complaint, follow the complaints procedure on their website. Under data protection rules, they should hold the correct information about you,
they are stating that you are Mr. Acott.
Comment
-
Yes, send the SAR first, yes it can be emailed.Originally posted by Forncett View PostSorry to bother you again can i send the Sar request by email? And would it be best to do this before i send a complaint about incorrect data?
https://www.linkfinancial.eu/candida...%20one%20month.
Comment
-
Hi there i have now received the SAR back and it does seem that in 2011 a ccj was given onbthe account, im really in need of some help now as im unsure what to do i don't have the money to pay this the card was initially taken out in 2004 and in 2008 is when link took it over
Any help greatly appreciated
Comment
-
I think you need to calm down.Originally posted by Forncett View PostHi there i have now received the SAR back and it does seem that in 2011 a ccj was given onbthe account, im really in need of some help now as im unsure what to do i don't have the money to pay this the card was initially taken out in 2004 and in 2008 is when link took it over
Any help greatly appreciated
O.K. they've got a CCJ, because it was in 2011, they would have to go back to Court to act on it. They would need a really good reason for the Judge / Court to entertain the CCJ. I would go ahead and lodge the complaint.
Comment
-
They can't 'lie', if they tried, it would have to be a 'whooper', i.e. aliens stole their pens and wouldn't give back when they asked nicely, that sort of thing.Originally posted by Forncett View PostWhat can i say in the complaint any help is greatly appreciated thankyou im Worried that they could possibly lie to get it back to court thanks so much for your help its greatly appreciated
Comment
-
No, your complaint is that they hold incorrect records on you. They have referred to you as Mr. Acott. That breaches Data Protection Rules even if it is an error. Tell them you are 'minded' to refer the matter to the ICO.Originally posted by Forncett View PostThank you do I complain about the amount of time that has lapsed?
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.


Comment