• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Lowell/Overdales - County Court Claim - Please help.

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Celestine View Post
    Hold on - we don't know if he is talking about credit file defaults or the expiry of a s.87 default notice. It's going to be close so personally I'd keep it in and let them prove it is not SB.
    What do you want to keep in?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Frampton444 View Post
      Hi Celestine.
      I'm not sure, I don't seem to be able to find it on MCOL.
      I know the Issue Date was 27/08/21 and I acknowledged the Claim on 14/09/21.
      I thought it was 14 days from that date, which would be today.
      You can file the Defence online with the Court, then post copies of the Defence, but get Proof of Posting for everything you post.

      Wait for Celestine to get back to you. Best get everything right first time.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by echat11 View Post

        You can file the Defence online with the Court, then post copies of the Defence, but get Proof of Posting for everything you post.

        Wait for Celeste to get back to you. Best get everything right first time.
        Really appreciate everyone's help with this.
        Would you suggest I post it too then? The online service says I don't need to, but would you do that anyway?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Frampton444 View Post

          Really appreciate everyone's help with this.
          Would you suggest I post it too then? The online service says I don't need to, but would you do that anyway?
          You need to posit it to the Claimant (Lowell's), You can email it to the Court (Send it via post to the Court).

          Comment


          • #20
            Well, off to post my letters. Fingers crossed for a reply soon, starting to freak out.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by echat11 View Post

              What do you want to keep in?
              The sentence about being statute barred I would keep in.

              If the credit file defaults show as 2016, the s.87 default notice expiry could easily be months earlier....
              "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

              I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

              If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

              If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Celestine View Post

                The sentence about being statute barred I would keep in.

                If the credit file defaults show as 2016, the s.87 default notice expiry could easily be months earlier....
                Thanks.

                Comment


                • #23
                  FRAMPTON444

                  You need to include the following:-

                  7.The Defendant contends the alleged debt is statute barred by virtue of Section 5 of the Limitations Act 1980 in that no payment or acknowledgment has been made for over 6 years

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by echat11 View Post
                    FRAMPTON444

                    You need to include the following:-

                    7.The Defendant contends the alleged debt is statute barred by virtue of Section 5 of the Limitations Act 1980 in that no payment or acknowledgment has been made for over 6 years
                    Fantastic, thanks everyone for their amazing help!
                    I have now sent the letters and submitted my defence, I'll await their response.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Have you submitted the Defence via email? If so which email address did you use?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by echat11 View Post
                        Have you submitted the Defence via email? If so which email address did you use?
                        I just submitted using the www.moneyclaim.gov.uk service, do I need to submit via email?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Frampton444 View Post

                          I just submitted using the www.moneyclaim.gov.uk service, do I need to submit via email?
                          I know there is a restriction for the number of characters when you file a Defence. So you can also use the following email address to file you Defence -

                          ccbcaq@justice.gov.uk

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by echat11 View Post

                            Yes, apparently it's o.k.. Two debts from different companies on the one claim form.
                            yes I know but should not be allowed to up case to where a charging order could be obtained £1000 and over?? just my thoughts awful legal system to allow that.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by MIKE770 View Post

                              yes I know but should not be allowed to up case to where a charging order could be obtained £1000 and over?? just my thoughts awful legal system to allow that.
                              Agree, I'm tempted to make a football analogy, VAR.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hi again. Thanks once more for your help with this back in September.

                                I am yet to receive any information back from anyone in regard to this, apart from the acknowledgment of defence from Overdales and letters back from the SAR's from each of the original companies saying the accounts aren't being handled by them anymore.
                                The MCOL website doesn't have any "transactions" past my defence filling in September, I was under the impression that they only had 28 days to respond to the court? Can someone tell me if there is anything I should be doing at this point?

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X