• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

one very quick question regarding defence in court for payday loan debt

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • one very quick question regarding defence in court for payday loan debt

    My first post, but i am an avid reader of this site and find the advice very thorough and consider this to be a valuable tool for the public in a sector where everything is stacked up against us.

    My quick question (I could not find an answer on the forums)

    Is not having received (after a cca request) the original default notice and termination of original loan agreement enough to mount a defence? All other documents (original debt agreement, transfer and assignments have been received)

    thanks
    Tags: None

  • #2
    The claimant needs to evidence that a default notice was issued and was compliant - in practice this doesn't mean they have to provide a true copy of the default notice, just the date it was sent and what it said. But if there was no default notice then there is no cause of action and the claim must fail ( helpfully confirmed recently in PRA v Doyle )

    Have they pleaded default date or termination in the particulars ?
    Do the terms mention ending the agreement - default & termination ?
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Amethyst

      Thanks so much for your reply.

      the particulars read:
      "The defendant owes the claimant xxx under a regulated loan agreement with lending stream ltd dated xxxx and which was assigned to the claimant on xxxxx and notice of which was given to the defendant on the xxxx (debt)
      despite formal demand...blah blah....failed to pay....blah blah claimant further claims interest thereon pursuant to section 69 of cc act 1984...ect"
      No default date or termination mentioned in particulars.

      Court date is this coming week and i intend to attend if you think my defence as mentioned in above post and outlined in defence statement I sent to court will hold water. Surprised they have pushed it to the wire for such a low initial claim unless they are sure of victory

      thanks again

      Comment


      • #4
        ALso, is there any thread in the forums that gives me an idea of what to expect in court? It will be a first for me so I am obviously a bit nervous as to how to approach it all...what I need to say/not say...ect.

        thanks

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by peterfranks View Post
          ALso, is there any thread in the forums that gives me an idea of what to expect in court? It will be a first for me so I am obviously a bit nervous as to how to approach it all...what I need to say/not say...ect.

          thanks
          Each Court deals with things differently, so its difficult to say how one judge will approach vs the next one
          I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

          If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

          I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

          You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

          Comment


          • #6
            SUCCESS!! Case dismissed today after 10 mins in court.

            Quite intimidating mind you....judge sitting 10 feet above me behind bench in massive courtroom.

            My defence , as confirmed by Amethyst was sound....and in addition the judge did not consider the copy of an email given by solicitors as proof of assignment of debt to claimant. Plus claimant solicitors were not present.

            All this possible only because of the help and advice I've seen given on the site. From my initial defence to witness statement. How to go about things, not feel intimidated and remain firm.

            I guess the company that thinks that using the name of Sherlock Holmes's nemesis to intimidate defendants forgot that in the books he always loses!!


            Thanks again.


            Last edited by peterfranks; 13th February 2019, 19:57:PM.

            Comment

            View our Terms and Conditions

            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
            Working...
            X