• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

yup Pt2537 is here now too

Collapse
Loading...
This thread is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

    Originally posted by pt2537 View Post
    im quite surprised Egg are referring to it already as we only received the approved judgment ourselves today

    I am obviously still going back over the case and in talks with the insurers etc,

    I will address the questions shortly and will write a summary of the case etc.
    oops crossed posts PT. Thanks that would be useful.

    Saw someone had received a letter from their 'lawyers' who are dropping an egg case, quoting Slater v Egg on the 20th August too.
    ( Unenforeable Credit Agreements - CAG )
    Last edited by Amethyst; 27th August 2010, 15:31:PM.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

      Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
      I expect Egg have copies they'd be more than happy to publicise on these sites.
      The full judgement or, just selected parts?

      Comment


      • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

        we do have the full approved judgment in the office,

        I have a draft judgment, here with me, but i would prefer to provide the full judgment from the approved copy, as there may well be inaccuracies in my copy
        I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

        If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

        I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

        You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

        Comment


        • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

          How curious, that Egg would send out these letters prior to the approved judgement being handed down?

          Comment


          • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

            Originally posted by middenmess View Post
            AC

            It gets worse...read this appeal in Brandon

            Legal Beagles Consumer Forum
            Please does anyone have a link to or a copy of the original judgment from the lower court in the Brandon case?

            Comment


            • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

              PT are you going to be posting up a copy of the approved Slater V Egg judgment this evening or do we have to wait until Tuesday ?

              I, for one, would rather see a copy of the full approved judgment rather than a summary!

              Comment


              • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                PT, you have suggested that Ms Slater, when she went on to the witness stand, told a different version of events than was contained in the witness statement, and in her discussiions with her legal team. Two questions
                1. how significant do you consider this was in the final judgement?
                2. why would she do this? One can only assume that this is a woman of at least normal intelligence and that she would know that this is hardly going to help the chances of her case being successful. This seems extremely odd to me.

                Comment


                • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                  PT is there ANY possibility it was a set-up meant to discredit such claims?

                  Comment


                  • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                    Hi

                    Pointless theorising really.
                    I dont know if this is a factor or just me getting above myself but if it makes a difference i promise not to comment or refer to the judgement either here or on any forum if it is posted this weekend for say at least a month.
                    People need to see this

                    Peter

                    Comment


                    • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                      Originally posted by seriously fed up View Post
                      Because I am a suspicous bugger, I would be interested to know what happened re Ms Slater. You see, here is a lady who has got expensive legal representation, paid for by insurance. Who tells her brief one thing and then gets up on the witness stand and says something else entirely. Now this makes me wonder why she would have done this?
                      It happens under stress SFU. Counsel are employed to dis-credit and confuse witnesses about their evidence. Without going into too much detail, I have regularly attended court in the past (for my employer) with expensive legal representation. I have seen employees give once answer to Counsel, literally minutes before going into the court room and then give a different answer once they're in the box and under cross-examination!


                      Originally posted by seriously fed up View Post
                      The one thing that always worried about this case was that we were taking the fight to them (the banks) and thus (just like Carey) the onus of proof was on us to show that Approved limit didnt equate to credit limit. That makes me nervous. Had it been the other way round - had Egg had to prove their case - I would have been much happier.
                      Agreed. I've always maintained that I would never initiate court action but would let the creditors do it instead. I guess all Egg have to do now is to refer to Ms Slater's case to prove their point.


                      My only take on this case, as with all of them actually, is that, as has been said before, it is something of a lottery. THE LAW IS AN ASS!! I have won cases that I didn't think we had a chance with and lost others that I thought were a dead cert...sometimes on the same day!!

                      I can't help but think that the economic climate has something to do with the recent surge in adverse judgements also but then again, that might just be the conspiracy theorist in me!

                      Oh well, I guess the letters from Apex will be starting again!!
                      Last edited by WelshMam2009; 27th August 2010, 20:48:PM.

                      Comment


                      • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                        ODC, just want to say your Avatar rocks man. Good one.
                        No surrender!

                        Comment


                        • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                          Seems to me that the courts and the banks are slowly closing each down and every argument we can use against the lenders. Even though the judgments stretch and even bend the Act by going against its true meaning each time, they both know there are few if any can afford to appeal.

                          It is clear there IS a conspiracy to save the banks from more embarrassing losses (funny how Waksman seem to keep cropping up).

                          I personally think I'm now screwed following the Slater and Brandon cases.

                          It's a fix!!!!!
                          They were out to get me!! But now it's too late!!

                          Comment


                          • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                            Originally posted by Budgie View Post
                            PT are you going to be posting up a copy of the approved Slater V Egg judgment this evening or do we have to wait until Tuesday ?

                            I, for one, would rather see a copy of the full approved judgment rather than a summary!
                            id love to, but i live on the southcoast and my office is north Wales, so its 280 miles to my office.

                            So it will have to wait til im back in the office as im spending some quality time with my children
                            I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

                            If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

                            I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

                            You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

                            Comment


                            • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                              i live on the southcoast
                              and a fine place to live too
                              If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of payments.

                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

                                Hello, I was a lurker next door and panicked somewhat, to see the Egg Thread Disappearance; I'm so glad that PT is here.

                                I don't understand all the legalese, but get the gist! I too have a 2001 Egg CC agreement so was interested in the outcome of this case, although I've not instigated any 'fight' yet.

                                Have a nice weekend everyone!

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X