Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

[natweststaffmember]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Nattie from your comments you may think that only the uneducated think that way but you'd be wrong. Many middle class who feel they have been conned by both the banks & the government feel much the same way. Also it's when the protests start emanating from such people that government should take note

When it does come from Middle England, give me a nudge, ok?

[StoneLaughter]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

That is well funny. I iz wiv u and me mates if you wanna put a trolly fru a window. I fink we should ban The Guardian, cos they iz well green.
Down wiv the monarchy coz we ain't been unhappy wiv them for a well long time.

INNIT!

[Brian]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

I had to read your post a couple of times to decipher the syntax Nattie, but I think I've got it now.

One thing that Bankstormer didnt ask you on your opinion, assume the banks "win" on this matter...?

whats you viewpoint on them then "mate"? (trust I spelt that right....:})

[natweststaffmember]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

I had to read your post a couple of times to decipher the syntax Nattie, but I think I've got it now.

One thing that Bankstormer didnt ask you on your opinion, assume the banks "win" on this matter...?

whats you viewpoint on them then "mate"? (trust I spelt that right....:})

On the banks' winning?

[EXC]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Whilst I disagree with the way Nattie made his post I do agree that pushing a supermarket trolley through a bank window is not a mature thing to suggest. It would achieve nothing other than discrediting the campaign.

[kev2b3]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Whilst I disagree with the way Nattie made his post I do agree that pushing a supermarket trolley through a bank window is not a mature thing to suggest. It would achieve nothing other than discrediting the campaign.

Totally agree. Nattie must be having a rare off day and pushing a trolley through the banks window is not the cleverest thing to carry out.
I also disagree with the way that the city workers fluttered £10.00 notes out of their office windows as people who had just lost thir jobs and homes walked by on a peaceful march the other days.

[natweststaffmember]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

That is well funny. I iz wiv u and me mates if you wanna put a trolly fru a window. I fink we should ban The Guardian, cos they iz well green.
Down wiv the monarchy coz we ain't been unhappy wiv them for a well long time.

For those who have met me in person. Do I speak like this?

[WendyB]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Thats not the point Nattie. It wouldn't matter what you speak like. It's what you seemed to be implying by speaking like that, that was the point. Seemed a bit "ist" ish. Like saying that only people like that are criminals and would even think of rioting, when we all know that isn't the case.

[natweststaffmember]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

To clarify, I do not condone the use of a trolley for access to a bank, I believe access should be through an open door during their normal opening hours. I don't read the Guardian that often. And I am not as republican in leaning as I was in my youth.
Anyone who does believe putting a trolley through a banks front or side windows is legitimised because of bank charges is quite frankly in cloud cuckoo land.

[kev2b3]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

That is well funny. I iz wiv u and me mates if you wanna put a trolly fru a window. I fink we should ban The Guardian, cos they iz well green.
Down wiv the monarchy coz we ain't been unhappy wiv them for a well long time.

Nattie i have never met you but i have followed your threads both on LB and other sites because of the good advise that you give. The above wasn't one of your best.

[natweststaffmember]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

So HoL arent sitting again till the 20th, shall we play a board game while we wait?
Credit Crunch: the board game | Credit Crunch | The Economist

:whistle::whistle::whistle::whistle::whistle::whis tle::whistle:

[WendyB]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Point taken. Can we move on please?

I have let Kofi back out of the cupboard for a while lol.........

[Brian]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Just to clarify on the "trolley"
Its not going through anyones window as the legal justice mechanism has to run its course, before "natural" justice takes over.
Apologies for not making that clear.

Query for you nattie: whats your opinion on your exboss having his windows bricked last week?

He (shred) really is/was a "Beacon" of the Banks in terms of how they are perceived.

[EXC]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Like Wendy said let's move on.

[righty]

Re: Appeal Judgment - 26th February 2009 - OFT v Abbey National Plc & Otrs

Thats not the point Nattie. It wouldn't matter what you speak like. It's what you seemed to be implying by speaking like that, that was the point. Seemed a bit "ist" ish. Like saying that only people like that are criminals and would even think of rioting, when we all know that isn't the case.

Quite right. I have never believed in the WTO as I have always thought it would lead to the major powers treating the 3rd World even more as mere vassal states

If I was young again I'd be manning the barricades as I did in the 60's over the Vet War