Kellys Vegies Court Claim

[Guest]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

Kelly

Like others on here I have had Businesses online and a Pup where I had to deal with awkward customers making complaints never ever did I resort to the arguments you have after a complaint they were all settled without resorting to an online slanging match and endless rants .
We all know that the Customer expects to be always right fraid that's not the case and allowances have to be made.

You have the right to take someone to court for non payment as well as they have the right to defend what has got up the nose of many is these actions and fines for bad reviews they could have been addressed without fining people which you have no right to do.

I suspect that you now feel that LB and other forums are out to shut you down probably not but they are advising consumers of their rights. hopefully you can come through this with dignity and regain the business you no doubt will lose its not the Agenda of Amethyst and the site team to destroy you

Not convinced i'm afraid. The "slagging" is mainly between the forum users rather than past customers. And I am constantly trying to defend my dignity on this site by not letting people talk bad about me "behind my back". It's just one thread after the other as if Beagles love to continue the online bullying

[Amethyst]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

To be fair Kelly, there is only a new thread due to you suing another of your customers.

[PAWS]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

Whatever you claim to have studied, lied to his bank,

I know your recent, well publicised actions would indicate you are familiar with the existence of libel laws however I really would advise you start a new thread or look at relevant posts to familiarise yourself with current legislation if you insist on making statements such as those referred to above. It is part of my work to be familiar with the current laws covering libel /slander. I have never studied consumer affairs in the manner you infer but used the term ‘studied’ to describe intensive research undertaken for assignments and commissions.
This is an open and democratic forum. It is for and used by intelligent, courteous people either giving or in need of advice. We respect each other’s opinion and learn from them. I regard access to such an impressive bank of knowledge and expertise an absolute privilege. I greatly value and respect the opinion of all those who post on the many forums. This is not simply a website where you can vent your spleen.

You're right, there is a lot of rubbish on other sites. Funny enough, if you had done your research before posting, it is the same disgruntled customers (though half of the negative google reviews are fake and not from customers) who have posted on various sites.

I think you will find some of the complaints go back years and are therefore unlikely to be one / same person. You took 9 customers to court – I assume they were all different people and not just the same customer. If you took the time to look around this site you will find other companies have far more complaints than you so this is not some sort of ‘vendetta’ however as the old adage says –Just because you are paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you.

[leclerc]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

Not convinced i'm afraid. The "slagging" is mainly between the forum users rather than past customers. And I am constantly trying to defend my dignity on this site by not letting people talk bad about me "behind my back". It's just one thread after the other as if Beagles love to continue the online bullying

Why are you trying to defend yourself on this site? You are taking someone to court for non payment and we are helping that person because they asked for our help? Not only that but you have written a review of this site which does not refer to the great successes that the forum has had in regards to issues such as PPI, Bank Charges, Financial hardship, Bailiffs and other such stuff. You've been on forums to ask for help(yes I've seen those posts too), and people have come on here seeking help. If all of your terms were 100% legalistic solid then there would not be much that we could suggest to people who came here apart from trying to find a way to make a reasonable payment plan or go through the courts to do so.

You believe that this forum is "slagging" you off. Well, don't come here and don't put a target on your back. If you built the firm from scratch to where it is today and are still taking on employees(yes, I've even read the ad for staff) then I expect you to be passionate about all aspects of the business but had you dealt with just one unsatisfied customer in a better manner then the Daily Mail would not have written an article about your business. Instead, they have and you are still on here claiming everyone is lying and everyone hates you.

Am sure I watched an interview with a celebrity who said that they stopped reading the press because of how angry it made them. All I can say to you is, stop coming on here and jousting with us because the more you do the more we start to wonder whether or not the things that are being said ARE true.
You will have your day in court. If you win then come back and roast the hell out of us but so far you have stated 9 court claims but not told us if any single one of them was defended in court. Once you defend the ones that we are helping IN COURT and you win, you can gloat ALL you like. At the moment, though, you're just blowing smoke into the air and not focusing on what should be important: YOUR BUSINESS.

[Guest]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

Why are you trying to defend yourself on this site? You are taking someone to court for non payment and we are helping that person because they asked for our help? Not only that but you have written a review of this site which does not refer to the great successes that the forum has had in regards to issues such as PPI, Bank Charges, Financial hardship, Bailiffs and other such stuff. You've been on forums to ask for help(yes I've seen those posts too), and people have come on here seeking help. If all of your terms were 100% legalistic solid then there would not be much that we could suggest to people who came here apart from trying to find a way to make a reasonable payment plan or go through the courts to do so.

You believe that this forum is "slagging" you off. Well, don't come here and don't put a target on your back. If you built the firm from scratch to where it is today and are still taking on employees(yes, I've even read the ad for staff) then I expect you to be passionate about all aspects of the business but had you dealt with just one unsatisfied customer in a better manner then the Daily Mail would not have written an article about your business. Instead, they have and you are still on here claiming everyone is lying and everyone hates you.

Am sure I watched an interview with a celebrity who said that they stopped reading the press because of how angry it made them. All I can say to you is, stop coming on here and jousting with us because the more you do the more we start to wonder whether or not the things that are being said ARE true.
You will have your day in court. If you win then come back and roast the hell out of us but so far you have stated 9 court claims but not told us if any single one of them was defended in court. Once you defend the ones that we are helping IN COURT and you win, you can gloat ALL you like. At the moment, though, you're just blowing smoke into the air and not focusing on what should be important: YOUR BUSINESS.

Sorry but I won't let people make up stories behind my back. It's ok if they want help to come to you for help on how to deal with the claim but to make up stories of abusive behaviour in order to tarnish my reputation is a different matter so sort out your moderation and perhaps publish these accusations once the claim has gone through the courts. I am still awaiting answers to very simple questions from Mr Thompson but he appears to be avoiding them.

[EXC]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

I am still awaiting answers to very simple questions from Mr Thompson but he appears to be avoiding them.

It is competely inappropriate to contact and ask direct questions to the opposing party while litigation is in progress.

[Guest]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

It is competely inappropriate to contact and ask direct questions to the opposing party while litigation is in progress.

And you think its appropriate for users to publish false accusations on this site without verifying the evidence first. I must say you have a strange way of reasoning.

This is not a court room but a forum that isn't moderated. Sorry

[Kati]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

And you think its appropriate for users to publish false accusations on this site without verifying the evidence first. I must say you have a strange way of reasoning.

This is not a court room but a forum that isn't moderated. Sorry

All the threads on here about your site are because we (LB) are helping people to respond to your court claims.
We do moderate threads (which you should have noticed after your last visit to the forum ... the ASA ruling thread was moderated drastically as a result) but we also believe in the value of 'free speech'.

- - - Updated - - -

You have been given a chance to respond to the 'accusations'. You have been asked for your side of the story.

[leclerc]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

Sorry but I won't let people make up stories behind my back.
It's not necessary to respond to that either if you believe that to be the case.
It's ok if they want help to come to you for help on how to deal with the claim but to make up stories of abusive behaviour in order to tarnish my reputation is a different matter so sort out your moderation and perhaps publish these accusations once the claim has gone through the courts.
A judge is there in court to decide on the balance of probabilities which story he believes based on the law and that is what we do. You take people's view at face value on here as they do not use their real name and help them to defend a claim. We'd do the same for you had the sock been on the other foot.
I am still awaiting answers to very simple questions from Mr Thompson but he appears to be avoiding them.

You have taken Mr Thompson to court so you can ask Mr Thompson those questions in court but it is not a good idea to continue correspondence with him if he is defending his claim rather than simply paying out on the claim without defending it. You both get your day in court.

You can continue to pedal the line that you are the victim but can I give you 2 scenarios and ask how you would deal with it?

1) I receive the veg box but some of the produce is spoiled. I ring you up to complain, what is the manner you would handle that complaint?

2) I am due a veg box and do not receive it and ring to complain. You find out that it was delivered yet I still insist I have not received any delivery. What is your solution to solve this issue?

[rthompson3000]

Re: Kellys Vegies Court Claim

It's only a false accusation if you can prove it, my word against yours at the moment, had you of been a bit more reasonable when speaking to me on the phone, its very likely this problem wouldn't have arisen and I wouldn't have a need to seek advice and assistance to deal with this matter, you accused me of theft which is still yet to be proven but I'm not shouting and screaming about it :notworking2"