• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

cap on the total cost of credit ( labour party conference claims )

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cap on the total cost of credit ( labour party conference claims )

    Ed. Milliband said at the conference "We will cap the cost of payday loans, and work to provide people on low incomes with alternative sources of affordable credit."



    So here's an impact report on doing such - '' The impact on business and consumers of a cap on the total cost of credit - March 2013 - Bristol Uni'

    14.6.7
    Concluding comments
    In theory, a cap on the total cost of credit would reduce the cost of short‐term borrowing. The available evidence about the impact of price restrictions on the cost that consumers pay for credit relates to interest rate restrictions, however, not the total charge for credit. The evidence reviewed for this research does not show unequivocally that price restrictions (in the form of interest rate restrictions) reduce the cost of borrowing to consumers, particularly those on low incomes. There is no evidence about the proportion of customers who pay less for short‐term credit after interest rate restrictions are introduced than they did before.

    If price restrictions were introduced in the UK, the evidence points strongly to a reduction in access to short‐term credit. Views will vary on whether this is a positive or negative outcome. Regardless, the large number of customers who use short‐term loans to meet essential expenditure underlines the need for any reduction in access to credit arising from intervention to be offset in other ways, for example through credit union expansion or by increased welfare benefits and wages. Even in the absence of price restrictions, these measures could benefit short‐term credit users.

    It seems unlikely that a price cap, however constructed, would directly address many of the other issues experienced by people who use short‐term credit. Other potential changes that might help improve outcomes for consumers who use short‐term credit include the development of better data sharing systems (particularly for payday loans), and implementation of the Good Practice Customer Charter for payday and other short‐term credit. They also include potential limits on the amount that can be applied in default charges or restrictions on the number of times a loan can be extended. While these measures may address some of the consumer detriments identified in this research, they are not directly aimed at reducing the headline cost of short‐term credit.
    Attached Files
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: cap on the total cost of credit ( labour party conference claims )

    All these studies and research were done over the pond six years ago, against mostly the same companies.

    Canada introduced the TCC cap and requires any lender to submit the applicants details to a database which shows up repeat application.

    These firms have their responses well rehearsed and they have generated a great deal of self interest by indoctrinating, a number of policy makers.

    They will not give way easily IMO. Eventually we will follow the lead of other nations, but of course as long as these studies keep being created and discussed they are given the opportunity to muddy the waters and stall any action.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: cap on the total cost of credit ( labour party conference claims )

      Interesting decision here

      http://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudi...sday%20Rulings

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: cap on the total cost of credit ( labour party conference claims )

        Adjudication from the case CashEuroNet UK LLC ( Pounds to Pocket )


        Upheld
        The ASA acknowledged the ad was for short-term credit and that there would be circumstances when consumers might find themselves in need of a loan. However, the ad did not offer any explanation as to why Bert had found it necessary to take out a loan. We noted that we had recently adjudicated on ads for credit where those circumstances of need had been clear, but that the current ad made more general references to wanting a loan without any sense that necessity had led to that decision.
        The ad stated that consumers could "pocket a loan today". We considered the use of an alien character removed the ad and the process of taking on debt, from reality which could disguise the seriousness and consequences of taking out credit. We considered that the combination of the use of the alien, with the claim "pocket a loan today" and the lack of context about why the loan was needed depicted a casual attitude to borrowing money and that the ad trivialised the decision to take out credit. We therefore concluded it was socially irresponsible.
        The ad breached BCAP Code rule 1.2 (Social responsibility).
        #staysafestayhome

        Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

        Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X