• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Man with cancer left 'dehumanised' by Halifax debt chase

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Man with cancer left 'dehumanised' by Halifax debt chase


    It's a story that begins with a man's diagnosis of cancer and ends up - 762 phone calls and a court case later - with one of the worst examples, according to the victim, of how banks dehumanise their customers.
    When David Lloyd, 62, was told he had terminal lung cancer in January 2006, his wife, Annette Edwards, contacted their bank, the Halifax, to let them know of his predicament and that he would no longer be able to work. They applied for a payout on an insurance policy, and for state benefits, but while they waited for the money to arrive they went overdrawn.
    Lloyd and Edwards, who had been a Halifax account holder for 15 years, claim the debt is around £800, but the bank says it is £4,000. The bank and its agents telephoned the couple 762 times over seven months in what they say is aggressive pursuit of the debt in calls made "morning, noon and night".
    Lloyd, who worked for the Institute of Civil Engineers until his cancer diagnosis, has developed a phobia of telephones and suffers from anxiety and depression. Edwards says the couple feel dehumanised because their situation was ignored.
    In May, the couple obtained a court undertaking at Leeds county court ensuring the Halifax would not contact them. Despite the undertaking, a letter from the Halifax arrived last Wednesday at the couple's home in Sale, Greater Manchester.
    At Manchester Justice Centre yesterday, the Bank of Scotland, the parent company of the Halifax, appeared before a judge in a contempt of court hearing instigated by the couple. The bank's barrister, James Counsell, said: "The bank issues its wholehearted fulsome apology for the error and the serious breach of the undertaking which it very much regrets."
    He said the bank had taken extensive steps to stop the correspondence and there had been no telephone calls since summer 2007. The bank paid £1,150 costs to the claimants and made a new undertaking to write to HBOS and ask its subsidaries not to contact the claimants using the Halifax logo.
    The couple also claim that their daughter, Stefanie Moore, 29, received 60 to 100 phone calls and two text messages, yet wasn't even a customer.
    It is doubtful that Lloyd, who has not been able to eat for 48 hours, will be alive when the harassment case comes to a full hearing in February. Edwards says of her husband: "He is prepared to put his head above the parapet because he doesn't want other people to go through what he has had to go through."

    guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2008 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

    More...

  • #2
    Re: Man with cancer left 'dehumanised' by Halifax debt chase

    '' phobia of telephones ''

    THANK YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!

    ''ask its subsidaries not to contact the claimants using the Halifax logo.''

    Idiots.

    I hope they have reclaimed the bloody charges as well.
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Man with cancer left 'dehumanised' by Halifax debt chase

      Complete and utter a....................s.

      If a child was being abused, Social Services would get involved, if an animal, it would be RSPCA.

      So why are banks allowed to abuse adults?!!!!!

      They make me sick.
      Last edited by Birdie; 6th December 2008, 11:14:AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Man with cancer left 'dehumanised' by Halifax debt chase

        Absolutely appalling but what can you expect from these parasites. Lets hope the Judge at the next hearing sends a message to these creeps by jailing someone & just what do they mean "not to use the logo" does that mean if they flog the debt to another bunch of twats they can harass him again
        Last edited by righty; 7th December 2008, 22:23:PM.

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X