Re: Norfolk Parking Enforcement and MJB Hotels
It seems that NPE did not bother to provide any evidence. This is the assessor's reason for allowing my appeal:
"By issuing the appellant with a PCN, the operator has implied that the appellant has not complied with the terms and conditions of the car park in question. It is the duty of the operator to provide evidence to POPLA of the terms and conditions that the appellant did not comply with. In this case, the operator has not provided any evidence to POPLA. As the operator has not provided a response to the appeal, it has not demonstrated that it issued the PCN correctly. Accordingly, I must allow this appeal."
It seems that NPE did not bother to provide any evidence. This is the assessor's reason for allowing my appeal:
"By issuing the appellant with a PCN, the operator has implied that the appellant has not complied with the terms and conditions of the car park in question. It is the duty of the operator to provide evidence to POPLA of the terms and conditions that the appellant did not comply with. In this case, the operator has not provided any evidence to POPLA. As the operator has not provided a response to the appeal, it has not demonstrated that it issued the PCN correctly. Accordingly, I must allow this appeal."

Comment