Re: Parking Eye
hi there newbie here to this forum. just spent the best part of 6 hrs trying to read up on parking eye as my mum was out with a blind friend who has a blue badge and parked in a car park monitored by parking eye but as the disabled bay was occupied she parked in a regular space but displayed our friends blue badge their "parking invoice" started she was in the car park 54 mins with the usual £60 if paid within 14 days or £100.
as many others have said advice seems to be to ignore but after alot of reading of this thread i would b grateful for any advice on how to proceed with this.
Parking Eye
Collapse
Loading...
This thread is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Parking Eye
Here is the link to the new thread M1 and I will add all the info to there, I am starting to scan it now and will delete the Personal info
>>
>>http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...ewthread&f=313
Many thanks again M1
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Ok M1, I will start a new thread and out all the info on there, thank you for your response, I will also out a link on here to the new thread, thank you again M1Originally posted by mystery1 View PostSigns are the signs they allege created a contract i.e. max 2 hours free or £1 an hour blah blah blah We want £100 if you make a mistake.
I don't care about planning and am not convinced the court will either. Not a defence at all as far as i'm concerned.
I mean your name and address. I don't want or need your personal info.
M1
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Originally posted by grant007 View PostM1, I will start a new thread yes no probs, but I dont understand what you mean about >>
Signs?
Who doesnt care about the planning?
What names and address are you meaning?
So basically I didnt understand any of your reply
I am so sorry M1 please elaborate

Signs are the signs they allege created a contract i.e. max 2 hours free or £1 an hour blah blah blah We want £100 if you make a mistake.
I don't care about planning and am not convinced the court will either. Not a defence at all as far as i'm concerned.
I mean your name and address. I don't want or need your personal info.
M1
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
M1 Mr Man ,
Would a defence using the ANPR (No permission) reason be a good defence and enough on its own for a defence, if so I will enter that just before the 20th but I could do with some help of Wording that really, Not sure why you felt a new thread is necessary but I will do if you feel I should?
I dont have pics of the signs as I am out in spain at the moment and dont return until the 21st.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
M1, I will start a new thread yes no probs, but I dont understand what you mean about >>Originally posted by mystery1 View PostNo problem.
Start a new thread and put up all the info you can. If you have the signs in picture that's brilliant. Don't give a sh1t about planning permission etc. Don't need names and addresses either but leave dates on any documents.
M1
Signs?
Who doesnt care about the planning?
What names and address are you meaning?
So basically I didnt understand any of your reply
I am so sorry M1 please elaborate
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
No problem.
Start a new thread and put up all the info you can. If you have the signs in picture that's brilliant. Don't give a sh1t about planning permission etc. Don't need names and addresses either but leave dates on any documents.
M1
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Hi Again M1, well I did send an email to these people yesterday and I havnt heard anything as of yet, will resend it again by email as I am out in Spain at the moment, I only have until the 20th to put a defence in and am also struggling to get anything in writing from the local council about there not being any planning consent for ANPR's , but they have actually told me (the council) that they are not aware or canoot find any, although if it is over the 4yrs then the 4 yr rule comes in that they dont need anynow, I did find a posting somewhere on the net though that the ANPRS would become live in Oct 2010, so that would mean the the 4yr rule wouldnt have come into force as of yet, so I know we are getting close to the 20th and although I have read many postings and started to read the Pranksters Guide but I am a bit confused what to enter on the defence for the 20th of this month if we dont get the Extention.Originally posted by grant007 View PostWould it be Ok to email them then M1 saying >>
Dear Sir/ Madam, with reference to parking offence No .....
Can I ask for an extension in filing my defence please pursuant to cpr15.5
Agreement extending the period for filing a defence
15.5
(1) The defendant and the claimant may agree that the period for filing a defence specified in rule 15.4 shall be extended by up to 28 days.
(2) Where the defendant and the claimant agree to extend the period for filing a defence, the defendant must notify the court in writing.
.
Any ideas's M1 please?
Many thanks as always
G:tinysmile_twink_t2:
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
In Scotland there is no keeper liability. If they want to sue someone it'd have to be the driver but they probably don't know who that is. Ignore.
M1
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Hey guys/gals...
Scotland here,just received my first parking charge notice for being 14 mins past my 90 mins allowed time....In that day thought I parked in Lidl ran in to get a juice and then sold my car that day to the garage right next to the store,evans halshaw...
The time for the sale was longer than anticipated and also on that day the sales rep took my car out and then reparked it in the same car park.....whats my stance on this?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Thank you M1, so does this sound Ok? >>
Dear Sir/ Madam, with reference to parking offence No .....
Can I ask for an extension in filing my defence please pursuant to cpr15.5 to allow digestion of the Cambridge case.
Agreement extending the period for filing a defence
15.5
(1) The defendant and the claimant may agree that the period for filing a defence specified in rule 15.4 shall be extended by up to 28 days.
(2) Where the defendant and the claimant agree to extend the period for filing a defence, the defendant must notify the court in writing.
I await your desicion.
Many thanks and With my regards
Mr ......
or Have I worded and added anything wrongly here please M1:tinysmile_hmm_t2:Last edited by grant007; 10th May 2014, 15:24:PM.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Pretty much but remember to mention waiting on the result of the Cambridge test case. 1. It's a valid reason to wait 2. If they refuse it could help with costs and unreasonable behaviour.
M1
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Parking Eye
Would it be Ok to email them then M1 saying >>Originally posted by mystery1 View Postenforcement@parkingeye.co.uk
ParkingEye Limited
PO Box 565
Chorley
PR6 6HT
01772 450970
You will need their written answer to forward to the court.
M1
Dear Sir/ Madam, with reference to parking offence No .....
Can I ask for an extension in filing my defence please pursuant to cpr15.5
Agreement extending the period for filing a defence
15.5
(1) The defendant and the claimant may agree that the period for filing a defence specified in rule 15.4 shall be extended by up to 28 days.
(2) Where the defendant and the claimant agree to extend the period for filing a defence, the defendant must notify the court in writing.
Would this be Ok or is it worded wrongly and should it be a hard copy in the post? I can obviously do both, and then await a reply.
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: