Overstone Court Cardiff non ob PCN LINK PARKING

[312d]

Ostell Cheers for your help so far

[ostell]

So you had family moving in and they are not providing copies of lease?

The signs may just be forbidding, ie permit holders only and no offer of a contract to those who don't have a permit.

What is the breakdown of that £264? it is excessive. Edit: Found it, they have claimed £60 as initial legal costs. Abuse of process they cannot claim costs other than the £50 solicitors costs allowed. Cases have been thrown out for such things.

[312d]

Hoping to get the info

[312d]

Ostell

[312d]

Ostell
ive got to submitted my defence today.
wonder if you are able to get me further plz.
cheers

[312d]

Help me further cheers

[ostell]

You could add on the forbidding signs argument

The signage in the car park is of a “forbidding” nature. It is limited to cars displaying a valid permit only and therefore the terms cannot apply to cars without a permit because the signage does not offer an invitation to park on certain terms. The terms are forbidding. This means that there was never a contractual relationship. I refer you to the following case law: PCM-UK v Bull et all B4GF26K6 [2016], UKPC v Masterson B4GF26K6[2016], Horizon Parking v Mr J C5GF17X2 [2016] – In all three of these cases the signage was found to be forbidding and thus only a trespass had occurred and would be a matter for the landowner.

[312d]

Hi Ostell,

ive entered that in my defence and have to submit it and see what happens.....

many thanks

[312d]

Hi Folks,
Again appreciate guidance please.

Link parking decided to pursue me.
Court papers arrived.
Defend and offer mediation?

The defendant has filed a defence but no copy attached?

see attachments.

have until the 25th to take next steps

cheers