• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Worried sick!

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Worried sick!

    wonder if they make a Swift exit???????

    Comment


    • Re: Worried sick!

      To defend LB and John his post was from a low point and no it doesn't give hope but it doesn't give false hope either. Have swifts solicitors done anything wrong legally, I am sure they have, LB and the like are full of posts where solicitors and barristers have bent the laws for their own ends its how they win at times. I am sure a lot of laws are based around morals so there is probably a fine line between the two at times.

      Comment


      • Re: Worried sick!

        Originally posted by rainydays20 View Post
        Have Swift's solicitors actually done anything wrong legally?
        Morally doesn't Count. Sorry
        http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/bobmarley/smallaxe.html
        CAVEAT LECTOR

        This is only my opinion - "Opinions are made to be changed --or how is truth to be got at?" (Byron)

        You and I do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.
        Cohen, Herb


        There is danger when a man throws his tongue into high gear before he
        gets his brain a-going.
        Phelps, C. C.


        "They couldn't hit an elephant at this distance!"
        The last words of John Sedgwick

        Comment


        • Re: Worried sick!

          Originally posted by rainydays20 View Post
          Have Swift's solicitors actually done anything wrong legally?
          Morally doesn't Count. Sorry
          See....In the early case of Holman v Johnson[3] Lord Mansfield CJ set out the rationale for the illegality doctrine.
          The objection, that a contract is immoral or illegal as between plaintiff and defendant, sounds at all times very ill in the mouth of the defendant. It is not for his sake, however, that the objection is ever allowed; but it is founded in general principles of policy, which the defendant has the advantage of, contrary to the real justice, as between him and the plaintiff, by accident, if I may say so. The principle of public policy is this; ex dolo malo non oritur actio. No court will lend its aid to a man who founds his cause of action upon an immoral or an illegal act.

          Comment


          • Re: Worried sick!

            Originally Posted by rainydays20
            Have Swift's solicitors actually done anything wrong legally?
            Morally doesn't Count. Sorry
            __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________


            CTYJ's note


            I do believe we have a fox in the henhouse!

            Possibly a Swift spy, methinks! :spy:
            __________________________________________________ ________________________________
            Wouldn't surprise me matey_____________________________________________ _______________________________
            __________________________________________________ ______________________________
            I have it on CD recording.............Mr McConnell ( a Swift Solicitor ) admitting that HE altered my partners truthfully declared income UPWARDS without telling us until 2 years later or asking checking with us it was OK to do that...........which it wasn't.
            This was to make it appear she could afford our secured loan.............That is a fact.
            RAINYDAY 20
            Would you say that " could be considered a wrongdoing" by a Swift solicitor?
            Sparkie

            Comment


            • Re: Worried sick!

              Originally posted by Sparkie1723 View Post
              Originally Posted by rainydays20
              Have Swift's solicitors actually done anything wrong legally?
              Morally doesn't Count. Sorry

              The example given was an illegal act. This is obviously wrong.
              My point was had Swift done anything that was wrong in law, this example says they had.
              I was unaware of Swift until I read the correspondence in this case, so sorry no fox.
              __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________


              CTYJ's note


              I do believe we have a fox in the henhouse!

              Possibly a Swift spy, methinks! :spy:
              __________________________________________________ ________________________________
              Wouldn't surprise me matey_____________________________________________ _______________________________
              __________________________________________________ ______________________________
              I have it on CD recording.............Mr McConnell ( a Swift Solicitor ) admitting that HE altered my partners truthfully declared income UPWARDS without telling us until 2 years later or asking checking with us it was OK to do that...........which it wasn't.
              This was to make it appear she could afford our secured loan.............That is a fact.
              RAINYDAY 20
              Would you say that " could be considered a wrongdoing" by a Swift solicitor?
              Sparkie


              The example given was an illegal act. This is obviously wrong.
              My point was had Swift done anything that was wrong in law, this example says they had.
              I was unaware of Swift until I read the correspondence in this case, so sorry no fox.

              Comment


              • Re: Worried sick!

                Originally posted by rainydays20 View Post

                The example given was an illegal act. This is obviously wrong.
                My point was had Swift done anything that was wrong in law, this example says they had.
                I was unaware of Swift until I read the correspondence in this case, so sorry no fox.

                Hii I wonder if it is worth my while checking with Swift to find out if my loan was based on my real salary that I was earning then or did they increase it without my knowing or would I be banging my head against a brick wall. Just a thought. Rosie

                Comment


                • Re: Worried sick!

                  sorry you don't like my post rainydays20 but I don't want anyone getting their hopes up against this scum company. What I have stated is true as others will confirm, if you lose to these people in court then the future is very grim.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Worried sick!

                    any updates?

                    Comment


                    • Re: Worried sick!

                      Originally posted by john 1963 View Post
                      any updates?
                      Hi I am still battling with the scumbags. I still cannot believe they are still denying everything they said about my property being marketed at £110,000 despite the fact they told me that when they phoned me about a year after my property was sold. I informed them it was on for £119,995 and therefore would have attracted a higher figure. They are still saying they don't know where I get the £110,000 from! I do from a completion statement they sent me. I am in the process of looking this out so I can send them
                      a copy. I have even been to my local MP. I have informed Swift I will contact This Morning as they have property solicitors on the programme sometimes when they are dealing with property issues. I intend to fight and fight with every fibre of my being. Sorting out my ex husband was a picnic compared to these scumbags. I feel they have stitched me up like a kipper.

                      keep you posted

                      Rosie

                      Comment


                      • Re: Worried sick!

                        Originally posted by Rosie500 View Post
                        Hi I am still battling with the scumbags. I still cannot believe they are still denying everything they said about my property being marketed at £110,000 despite the fact they told me that when they phoned me about a year after my property was sold. I informed them it was on for £119,995 and therefore would have attracted a higher figure. They are still saying they don't know where I get the £110,000 from! I do from a completion statement they sent me. I am in the process of looking this out so I can send them
                        a copy. I have even been to my local MP. I have informed Swift I will contact This Morning as they have property solicitors on the programme sometimes when they are dealing with property issues. I intend to fight and fight with every fibre of my being. Sorting out my ex husband was a picnic compared to these scumbags. I feel they have stitched me up like a kipper.

                        keep you posted

                        Rosie

                        Nem - Hi I am still battling it out with Swift. I had a letter recently with two emails I sent to them both of which appear to have been edited. One about equity release states that I am completing on this! I told Swift that I would have needed to pay both Kensington and their loan off entirely after which there would not have been enough equity left to release anything. The other one about Gateway Homes Swift state that I was having a viewing had that been the case I would have had an offer, there was no viewing therefore no offer. I don't even recall hearing from Gateway Homes. It seems to me that somebody at Swift has edited these emails for their own ends. Is it illegal to edit emails. I am not sure on this. I am going back to the FOS. It is about time Swift did the right thing and get things sorted. They are getting like Hitler telling me that if I raise concerns about anything that has already been"dealt" with they will just make a note on my file and I won't get any response they will only make a note on my file. Rosie500

                        Comment


                        • Re: Worried sick!

                          tagging [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] and [MENTION=6]Amethyst[/MENTION] xx
                          Debt is like any other trap, easy enough to get into, but hard enough to get out of.

                          It doesn't matter where your journey begins, so long as you begin it...

                          recte agens confido

                          ~~~~~

                          Any advice I provide is given without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                          I can be emailed if you need my help loading pictures/documents to your thread. My email address is Kati@legalbeagles.info
                          But please include a link to your thread so I know who you are.

                          Specialist advice can be sought via our sister site JustBeagle

                          Comment


                          • Re: Worried sick!

                            Originally posted by Rosie500 View Post
                            Nem - Hi I am still battling it out with Swift. I had a letter recently with two emails I sent to them both of which appear to have been edited. One about equity release states that I am completing on this! I told Swift that I would have needed to pay both Kensington and their loan off entirely after which there would not have been enough equity left to release anything. The other one about Gateway Homes Swift state that I was having a viewing had that been the case I would have had an offer, there was no viewing therefore no offer. I don't even recall hearing from Gateway Homes. It seems to me that somebody at Swift has edited these emails for their own ends. Is it illegal to edit emails. I am not sure on this. I am going back to the FOS. It is about time Swift did the right thing and get things sorted. They are getting like Hitler telling me that if I raise concerns about anything that has already been"dealt" with they will just make a note on my file and I won't get any response they will only make a note on my file. Rosie500
                            Hello Rosie,

                            Changing a personal letter of any sort in an attempt to deceive would nor be lawful.

                            Do you have copies of the original mail?

                            nem

                            Comment


                            • Re: Worried sick!

                              Originally posted by Rosie500 View Post
                              Nem - Hi I am still battling it out with Swift. I had a letter recently with two emails I sent to them both of which appear to have been edited. One about equity release states that I am completing on this! I told Swift that I would have needed to pay both Kensington and their loan off entirely after which there would not have been enough equity left to release anything. The other one about Gateway Homes Swift state that I was having a viewing had that been the case I would have had an offer, there was no viewing therefore no offer. I don't even recall hearing from Gateway Homes. It seems to me that somebody at Swift has edited these emails for their own ends. Is it illegal to edit emails. I am not sure on this. I am going back to the FOS. It is about time Swift did the right thing and get things sorted. They are getting like Hitler telling me that if I raise concerns about anything that has already been"dealt" with they will just make a note on my file and I won't get any response they will only make a note on my file. Rosie500
                              Do you have the original emails you sent?

                              (oops sorry Nem was reading )
                              #staysafestayhome

                              Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                              Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

                              Comment


                              • Re: Worried sick!

                                Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
                                Do you have the original emails you sent?

                                (oops sorry Nem was reading )
                                No problem Ame,

                                I find this lastest development rather shocking if mail has been " altered " in this case how many more have been treated this way.

                                nem

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X