Hello guys,
Thanks for your wonderful contribution on this forum. I was taken to court by Mr Carter because of Argos debt. The particulars of claim is as follows;
1) The claimant claim is for the balance due under an agreement which is now due and payable
2) The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalment under account number 888888 but has failed to do so
3) And the claimant claims the sum of LLLLL
4) The claimant also claim interest thereon pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to uuu.
I filed the defence online contesting it that i have requested documentation( part 18 of civil procedure rules) from BC
Step 2:
~ BC replied that because it is a small claim track that they are NOT required to provide documentation but have asked original creditor to provide though.
~ The case had been transfered to my local court.
~ BC had sent me a copy of his witness statement sent to court which includes argos statement of account.
Step 3: I saw the following loopholes;
a) There is NO default notice
b) No notice of assignment
c) The agreement was blurred and difficult to read.
It was a 2003 agreement.
Can anyone help with witness statement or other clues
Cheers
Thanks for your wonderful contribution on this forum. I was taken to court by Mr Carter because of Argos debt. The particulars of claim is as follows;
1) The claimant claim is for the balance due under an agreement which is now due and payable
2) The defendant agreed to pay monthly instalment under account number 888888 but has failed to do so
3) And the claimant claims the sum of LLLLL
4) The claimant also claim interest thereon pursuant to s69 county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8% per annum amounting to uuu.
I filed the defence online contesting it that i have requested documentation( part 18 of civil procedure rules) from BC
Step 2:
~ BC replied that because it is a small claim track that they are NOT required to provide documentation but have asked original creditor to provide though.
~ The case had been transfered to my local court.
~ BC had sent me a copy of his witness statement sent to court which includes argos statement of account.
Step 3: I saw the following loopholes;
a) There is NO default notice
b) No notice of assignment
c) The agreement was blurred and difficult to read.
It was a 2003 agreement.
Can anyone help with witness statement or other clues
Cheers
Comment