No training to perform role, no management support.

[judgemental24]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

And this would fall under article 2 of the H&S at work act I presume?

Yes you are correct

[Karla8]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

deleted

[matt3942]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

I don't disagree; however, the claimant will have to demonstrate that he/she has suffered from work-related stress as a direct result of the lack of training, which is not easy to do.

By all means refer to S2. of the HASAW but I wouldn't pin everything on it - I would be more inclined to use 'mutual trust and confidence' as the main argument.

@Karla8 - I presume you are not the only driver to have taken on these additional responsibilities? Has anyone else received additional training? If not, how are they coping?

[matt3942]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

Thank you. Any idea on where I stand on the false accusation of unauthorised absence in spite of my presentation of a doctors note? They changed it to an alternative reason, but only after my phoning up and questioning it?

I think you'd struggle to prove this was intentional. The employer could easily argue it was an administrative error, especially as it was changed when you brought it to their attention.

[Karla8]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

deleted

[judgemental24]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

The fact the doctor has already signed you off previous with a work place stress related condition is your persausion on this matter

Has the employer offered any referral to Occupational health??

[Karla8]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

deleted

[judgemental24]

Re: No training to perform role, no management support.

Not really

It was more a referenced paper trail if needed i was after

The Root Cause of that stress will be decided on the balance of probability