Unlawful deductions even though i signed?

[law novice]

Re: Unlawful deductions even though i signed?

Nope, still not sure what you're on about. I think you have misunderstood me.

You said that the court may rule that if the cost to the company was more than £299 then the court may order us to pay back the excess. I was trying to explain that even if the court might agree that the company were entitled to more than £299 in course costs, because they deducted the money unlawfully in the first place (i.e. the 4 days wages they deducted without pernmission) the court would rule that they lose the right to that money (in a separate claim for example), at least that's what I've found in my hunt for the legalities of our case. Does that make sense?

[Johnboy007]

Re: Unlawful deductions even though i signed?

Nope, still not sure what you're on about. I think you have misunderstood me.

You said that the court may rule that if the cost to the company was more than £299 then the court may order us to pay back the excess. I was trying to explain that even if the court might agree that the company were entitled to more than £299 in course costs, because they deducted the money unlawfully in the first place (i.e. the 4 days wages they deducted without pernmission) the court would rule that they lose the right to that money (in a separate claim for example), at least that's what I've found in my hunt for the legalities of our case. Does that make sense?

It does now mate........
Just goes to show how a statement can be interpreted in a different way.
Either that or the old grey matter is deteriorating.:tinysmile_hmm_t2: