• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

"standard" Letter before claim

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "standard" Letter before claim


    In brief.
    Defendant householder cut through electricity supply cable encased in concrete under his driveway.
    Claimant repaired the cable
    Claimant says cable was 200mm below surface of driveway
    Claimant issued Letter before Claim(LBC) 4 months later - no previous correspondence and begins "We are now in a position to serve our Letter of Claim pursuant to the Pre Action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes.
    Claim is in negligence, claims for it's "losses"
    Included in it's LBC is it's "invoice" for the repair works. (£536)
    Claimant admits that it's LBC is a 'standard' LBC
    Many of the defendant's 'failings" alleged by claimant are simply not relevant e.g failing to properly supervise it's employees & "Failing in all the circumstances to design or implement safe systems of work"
    Defendant made request for information, most of which were refused
    Defendant made formal response to each of the alleged failings.
    Defendant denies liability.
    Claimant says that invoice must be paid within 14 days or it will become "overdue for payment" (14 days not expired yet)
    LBC was, in fact, issued by and signed by a finance assistant in the Claimant's credit control department, who has dealt with the matter throughout.
    Refuses to say whether the "invoice" includes a markup.

    Seems to me that claimant has mixed up two different legal concepts - a claim in negligence and payment of a debt due under contract.

    Any comments welcome.



    Tags: None

  • #2
    Sounds like the wrong protocol has been used, which wouldn't be fatal to a claim, but might make it difficult for the claimant to later claim any costs if he were successful. It's likely a claim in tort, but not a contract claim.

    Has anything further happened?

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree - it's a claim in negligence - nothing further happened. I have come across a similar claim on here. Seems like the claim will issue just before the limitation period 5 years hence!

      https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...l-claims-court

      Comment


      • #4
        Defendant chose to settle as he was selling the house and was concerned about his credit rating when seeking a mortgage on his new house.

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

        Announcement

        Collapse

        Support LegalBeagles


        Donate with PayPal button

        LegalBeagles is a free forum, founded in May 2007, providing legal guidance and support to consumers and SME's across a range of legal areas.

        See more
        See less

        Court Claim ?

        Guides and Letters
        Loading...



        Search and Compare fixed fee legal services and find a solicitor near you.

        Find a Law Firm


        Working...
        X