Hello,
We won our Section 21 repossession claim as litigants in persons. The judge balked at the costs that we asked for despite poor behaviour from the claimant. we were given £400 despite asking for £1500 and being able to show lost earnings. We asked for costs to be assessed on an indemnity basis and are not sure if it was granted on that basis, but assume that it was since there was clear poor behaviour from the other side; the claim has no prospect of success.
Today we get the letter and it states £300 despite the judge having said £400 at the hearing.
My questions:
1.) what track are repossession hearings considered anyways?
2.) Can I ask the judge to reconsider the costs as a whole? I think we can show costs of £1500.
3.) Can I ask for permission to appeal? Will I be able to recoup costs if I win?
Thank you.
We won our Section 21 repossession claim as litigants in persons. The judge balked at the costs that we asked for despite poor behaviour from the claimant. we were given £400 despite asking for £1500 and being able to show lost earnings. We asked for costs to be assessed on an indemnity basis and are not sure if it was granted on that basis, but assume that it was since there was clear poor behaviour from the other side; the claim has no prospect of success.
Today we get the letter and it states £300 despite the judge having said £400 at the hearing.
My questions:
1.) what track are repossession hearings considered anyways?
2.) Can I ask the judge to reconsider the costs as a whole? I think we can show costs of £1500.
3.) Can I ask for permission to appeal? Will I be able to recoup costs if I win?
Thank you.



Comment