Tweet
Re: CABOT claim rec'd - renaltmagnummad
hehehe
As if by magic CB arrived.
here you go, new one for N'hampton claims of this nature:
So here's the plan:
1. file basic defence (above)
2. write to the court pointing out the failure of the claimant to comply with their CPR 31.14 obligations
3. write to the other side and tell them what you have done
hehehe
As if by magic CB arrived.
here you go, new one for N'hampton claims of this nature:
Defence
1.The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR.
2.Even making allowance for the Northampton Bulk Regime the claim fails to disclose sufficient information as required by the CPR, there is no reference to any date of alleged agreement, no assignment documentation, no date of alleged default or details of any default notice served in accordance with s87 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974, the claim is missing vital information.
3. Without admission that any cause of action is shown by the Claimant it is denied that the Claimant has a claim whether as pleaded or at all.
4. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon
5. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimant’s claim appears without merit
6.Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.
1.The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR.
2.Even making allowance for the Northampton Bulk Regime the claim fails to disclose sufficient information as required by the CPR, there is no reference to any date of alleged agreement, no assignment documentation, no date of alleged default or details of any default notice served in accordance with s87 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974, the claim is missing vital information.
3. Without admission that any cause of action is shown by the Claimant it is denied that the Claimant has a claim whether as pleaded or at all.
4. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon
5. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimant’s claim appears without merit
6.Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.
1. file basic defence (above)
2. write to the court pointing out the failure of the claimant to comply with their CPR 31.14 obligations
3. write to the other side and tell them what you have done
Comment