I m a shareholder in a (micro) company. I was in a previous dispute with the company which went to court with me as claimant and litigant as person. And I lost. The outcome was littered with issues. The Judges summing up included numerous inaccuracies.I should have filed for an appeal, but I was exhausted and out of my depth at that time. The company directors are at fault in many many breaches of fiduciary duty. It would appear the 'company' solicitors are really in practice representing only the Directors interests above that of the company.
Prior to making a claim I have requested, as is my right as a SH with 20% to see the company accounts and to see a list of members. As there is reason to believe the board have failed to register members and have failed to provide accurate accounts to Companies House and HMRC. Having made the request the 'company' solicitors have promptly replied that they are considering a Civil Restraint Order against me subject to CPR 3.11 and PD 3C. Can they do this to prevent what is fairly an attempt to obtain justice and an account of the Directors conduct?
Prior to making a claim I have requested, as is my right as a SH with 20% to see the company accounts and to see a list of members. As there is reason to believe the board have failed to register members and have failed to provide accurate accounts to Companies House and HMRC. Having made the request the 'company' solicitors have promptly replied that they are considering a Civil Restraint Order against me subject to CPR 3.11 and PD 3C. Can they do this to prevent what is fairly an attempt to obtain justice and an account of the Directors conduct?