Hello I have made a stupid mistake by suing the wrong Amazon company. I have taken Amazon to small claims court because I made a return of 4 IPhones and was only refunded for 2. It’s been around 6 months since this has happen and Amazon still refused to refund my money. I made a small small claims against them and they gave defence claiming I’m suing the wrong company and that it should be Amazon EU SARL. Please help I have attached their defence below.
Wrong Amazon company small claims
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
You can apply to the Court under Part 19 of the Civil Procedure Rules [link below] to substitute the correct defendant.
Reading the defence, are you sure that you have good grounds to bring your claim?
CPR 19: https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pr...l/rules/part19
Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
To be honest I have seen a similar post and have already contacted evershields today to agree to discontinue. To be honest I feel lost and defeated and don’t even want to carry on with my case even though the sum is more thank 2k. I’m only 19 and don’t know how any of these court systems work and don’t want to lose more money than I already have.
Comment
-
Paragraph 14 of the Defence is what gives rise to this question. This makes me wonder whether Amazon are saying that they did not accept your order and so there is no contract (this involves me making an assumption about your claim, albeit that the assumption might be wrong).Originally posted by Dreecesixo View PostYes I should hope so, what makes you question if I have good grounds please let me know.
But I see you will be discontinuing the claim.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
Yes. But wouldn't it be easier to apply to substitute the Defendant? See post no 3.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
No. You need to make a formal application and pay the fee. See CPR 19 and Practice Direct 19A.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
In which case you start a new claim and comply with CPR Part 6 rules 30 onwards and Practice Direction 6B in respect of service out of the jurisdiction (links below).
To avoid that hassle, you could ask Eversheds if they will accept service for the Luxembourg company, and if they agree, serve them.
CPR 6, rules 30 onwards - https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pr...ules/part06#IV
PD6B - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...f=true&sd=trueLawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.

Comment