I have been been communicating with Mortimer Clarke solicitors regarding a claim by Hillesden that i am claiming is status barred,they have just responded with a letter saying saying the six year limitation runs from the latest date on which :
1. A payment was made towards the debt; or
2. The agreement was terminated; or
3. You acknowledged the debt in writing.
They then go on to say the agreement was terminated on 08/09/2010 therefore proceedings were issued within the 6 year limitation period,and so the claim is not status barred and if i disagree i should set out the precise legal basis and give the date i believe the debt became status barred.
Just hoping someone would be able to offer some guidance on this,are they correct in saying the six years run from the date they terminated the contract and if not is there a precise legal basis on which i could prove the debt is status barred?
I would be most grateful for any info or pointers that could be offered,thanks.
1. A payment was made towards the debt; or
2. The agreement was terminated; or
3. You acknowledged the debt in writing.
They then go on to say the agreement was terminated on 08/09/2010 therefore proceedings were issued within the 6 year limitation period,and so the claim is not status barred and if i disagree i should set out the precise legal basis and give the date i believe the debt became status barred.
Just hoping someone would be able to offer some guidance on this,are they correct in saying the six years run from the date they terminated the contract and if not is there a precise legal basis on which i could prove the debt is status barred?
I would be most grateful for any info or pointers that could be offered,thanks.
Comment