Hillesden Securities vs darmah900

[joedempsey]

Re: Hillesden Securities vs darmah900

I would also post a similar letter to restons, for a licensed solicitor their behaviour is not acceptable. I would include a threat the SCA about it.

[darmah900]

Re: Hillesden Securities vs darmah900

Cabot are really pulling some fast ones here with CCA Request.

I suggest a letter to Mr Nigel Petrie - Coe at Restons.

Restons Solicitors
.
.
For the Personal Attention of

Nigel Petrie Coe.


Date...

CC Claim Number..............................:

Your Client Hillesden Securities T/A DLC

Dear Mr Petrie Coe,

I am most concern about the conduct of this claim by Restons, Hillesdon Securities Ltd T/ A DLC and
Cabot.

I require a full explanation as to why a request for an agreement made under the provision of CCA 1974
addressed and delivered to the Claimant as clearly named as Hillesden Securities Ltd T/A DLC with the appropriate
statutory fee has been rejected and found it's way into the hands of Cabot which demands that payment should be
made to Cabot I believe this is unreasonable and is designed to forestall compliance with a lawful request for information.

I expect and require a full explanation for such conduct which is also being reported for information purposes to the FCA.

Send by signed for post and send a copy to Hillesden as well.

Well hello again [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION]

Here is the latest instalment from Restons in response to the letter you kindly outlined above.....
It's starting to sound like silly "we haven't actually got any documents or a leg-to-stand-on" tactics to me, but this whole Cabot thing is a mystery!
Why aren't Cabot on the CC as the claimant, if they (as Restons seem to be saying) are the "creditor".
(this is a hypothetical question.... I'm not expecting an answer! :-) )

Shall I take the bait and send another CCA request to Hillesden, with payment made out to Cabot, or is this a ploy of some kind?

After all, I have no idea who Cabot are (as regards this claim against me)!

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

[Celestine]

Re: Hillesden Securities vs darmah900

LOL that's brilliant. OK so they have finally made the CCA request back to the original creditor as they should have done longgggg ago, if you wish, respond to this letter enclosing the £1 fee payable to Cabot but outlining how misleading their conduct has been against a litigant in person.
You are not possessed of psychic powers I take it, nor are you familiar with the complex plethora of debt companies operating so how on earth were you supposed to work out that Hillesden (the claimant) is not who you should have made payment to?!
where are you at in the court process now? Have you had a directions questionnaire from court yet?

[charitynjw]

Re: Hillesden Securities vs darmah900

LOL that's brilliant. OK so they have finally made the CCA request back to the original creditor as they should have done longgggg ago, if you wish, respond to this letter enclosing the £1 fee payable to Cabot but outlining how misleading their conduct has been against a litigant in person.
You are not possessed of psychic powers I take it, nor are you familiar with the complex plethora of debt companies operating so how on earth were you supposed to work out that Hillesden (the claimant) is not who you should have made payment to?!
where are you at in the court process now? Have you had a directions questionnaire from court yet?

Hi Celestine

I don't know whether it is of any importance, but Miss L Murtagh (Restons) has gone from being a paralegal (post #24) to Trainee Solicitor (post #32)..

[nemesis45]

Re: Hillesden Securities vs darmah900

Well hello again @nemesis45

Here is the latest instalment from Restons in response to the letter you kindly outlined above.....
It's starting to sound like silly "we haven't actually got any documents or a leg-to-stand-on" tactics to me, but this whole Cabot thing is a mystery!
Why aren't Cabot on the CC as the claimant, if they (as Restons seem to be saying) are the "creditor".
(this is a hypothetical question.... I'm not expecting an answer! :-) )

Shall I take the bait and send another CCA request to Hillesden, with payment made out to Cabot, or is this a ploy of some kind?

After all, I have no idea who Cabot are (as regards this claim against me)!

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

I would reply along the lines of that Cabot does not make this clear and it's only when a CCA request has been made that this " ploy" comes to light so it's clear that the intention is to delay the request and a report is being to the FCA regarding Cabot's unfair business mrthods.

nem