• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • illustriousmuz
    started a topic Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Sorry for reposting this here, but didn't realise there was a dedicated forum to BC Court Cases.

    At the beginning of this year, I received a claim form from Bryan Carter acting on behalf of Lowell for a debt to ShopDirect. I had received letters from Lowell and another company called Red and Frederickson all chasing the same debt. I never received a default notice from the original creditor, nor had I received a notice of assignment. I know that I was meant to have these but Lowell has refused to ever supply me with them.



    When the claim arrived I immediately responded via the moneyclaim website indicating my position on the claims of Lowell. Mentioning the lack of Default Notice and Notice of Assignment. I had elected to go through arbitration to maybe resolve this but Bryan Carter never attempted it and it was allocated to the fast track for review at my local county court.


    Taking advice from some of the other posts on this forum, I hit Lowell with a CPR and CCA request to which I have never had a response. The only downside to this now is that I sent these documents through my work post service, recorded but I was laid off in April and I can't get any proof that I sent them. I also received a letter saying that they'd settle the account for a minimal amount of around £300 which to avoid any further bother I was happy to pay, however when I called this amount no longer was prepared to be accepted and they asked for close to the full amount. In the same call, I queried the lack of a response to my CCA/CPR request including information on the default notice. The lady at Bryan Carter told me that they never respond to them because it's down to the original creditor to provide that documentation before their clients ever take on the debt!


    Anyway, I'd hoped to get it resolved in some fashion but the other day I received a Witness Statement from Bryan Carter. I don't know what to do now. The court case is less than 2 weeks. I'm worried sick. Not sleeping.


    I was hoping someone could help me with a few things though:



    1. Attached to the witness statement is a supposed statement of account, but this appears to be some kind of filled in excel form with my name on it and a value of £754 filled in. This is the first time i've seen such a document. Would this be something they'd send in a CCA/CPR request?
    2. The witness statement says my account defaulted on the 2nd October - Lowell claim to have purchased this debt on the 4th. That seems a little quick to me. Also, the initial claim form says they purchased the debt on around the 11th. None of their dates make sense. The letter they claim to be the notice of assignment from the original creditor, (which I never received), is dated the 15th.
    3. Is there a difference between a Default Notice and a Notice of Assignment? I've received neither and find it odd that they have stuck in a supposed copy of the Assignment but not one for the default notice.
    4. If Lowell own the debt who then are Red and Frederickson in relation to them? What if I'd paid them?
    5. Since I don't have proof of my CCA and CCR requests, can I stick them in now and ask the court for a delay in proceedings? The first I've heard about them not receiving the CPR/CCA requests is in this witness statement.




    They're now asking the court for over £1107 - I'm so annoyed. I've tried to make offers with them, even offering to pay a full amount they asked for only to be told that was no longer enough. They're a total shower.

    It's probably worth mentioning too that I'm still looking for work after being made redundant in April. I've told Lowell/BC this and offered to settle it for the lower amount they wanted in one go just to get them off my back but they're refusing to budge.


    Any advice would be greatly appreciated
    Tags: None

  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    I think you may as well get the N244 sorted and in to court then. To enforce the judgment they do have to apply to the court for a warrant of control and they write to you first with 14 days notice so bailiffs shouldn't just show up - the N244 will put that all on hold anyway. Are you eligible for fee remission at all ?

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Well, I've had several emails from Bryan Carter but no official confirmation that they'll agree to set-aside the judgement.

    The last email contained a scan of the judges order dated 20th May asking if I had received that document. Sure enough, in the version they sent me there certainly was a second page in there that contains instructions on delivering a witness statement to the court 14 days before the hearing date but in my letter I don't have that second page; only the first that says the hearing was to be held on the 1st October. I've replied to confirm that I did receive the first page but not the second with the instructions on providing a witness statement but so far I've heard nothing back from them.

    I'm really worried that they're stalling for time and are going to try and enforce this judgement but I'm not sure if I'm worrying over nothing or if I have a legitimate concern. What are the rules on enforcing a judgement? Can they just send a bailiff or court officer to my front door? I can really do without this extra stress. I'm getting anxiety attacks in the night and just feel generally unwell while all of this looms over me.

    Given that I have so far had no response from Carter to my last email, which was sent on 29th October, should I just go ahead and file the N244? Or would the fact that the solicitors are engaging in a discussion over this make any difference if it came to them applying to enforce the order?

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Perfect, Thank You!

    I've just fired that off to BC and hopefully I'll get a response today. The fact is, my dealings with this crowd have so far given me no inclination to believe that anything they do or say is done without some ulterior motive. Hopefully they'll agree to the set aside and it will be a much cheaper option than applying for a hearing.

    My only concern is that their own fear of being told off about failing to respond to requests for information, (perhaps ultimately costing them a judgment), might force their hand to stick with the default order.

    There's a lot of stress with all of this i tell you

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Dear Mr Carter

    Thank you for your response. I can confirm I received an order from the court issued on 20th May 2015. The documents received were the hearing date and an booklet regarding mediation. I did not receive any order or information relating to submitting documents or witness statements to the court. My witness statement was submitted on xxx in response to your clients witness statement. I have since researched the matter and can only assume the court failed to include the additional documents with the hearing date order.

    Can you confirm if you have now received the judgment order from the court and if your client's are willing to consent to my set-aside request. If not, I shall proceed with making an application to the court and request a hearing for the matter to be decided upon.

    Regards

    Muz

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Hi Everyone,

    Looking for a little advice. I received a response to my email that I sent off on Monday from Bryan Carters. For context I'll put what I sent and their response here

    Dear Sirs

    In response to your letter dated xxxx, I am writing to you by email to confirm that I have not received an order dated 20th May 2015

    If you could please let me have a response to my letter of the 6th October 2015 I would be most grateful

    Regards

    IllustriousMz
    This morning, this arrived in my inbox

    Dear Mr Muz

    Thank you for your email.

    Before we can seek further instructions from our client please can you confirm if the court has informed you that the order of 20 May 2015 was sent to you and if it was sent to your current address.

    Yours Sincerely

    Bryan Carter Solicitors LLP
    The fact is, I simply don't trust this lot and I'm worried that they're just playing for time. I've already indicated that I have not got an order so it would be prudent to assume that if I don't have the order, it's either been lost or was not included in the letter I did receive on the 20th May with information on the court hearing. I have of course spoken to the court and they believe the order was sent on the 20th May with the hearing letter but like I said earlier, I do not have that document in my posession and I certainly don't recall reading anything other than the hearing information and the pamphlet that came with it; I've kept and responded to everything else the court has sent to me. The court clearly believe the document was sent. This sounds like them trying to set me up for something.

    How do you think I should respond?
    Last edited by Amethyst; 21st October 2015, 12:26:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    OK So i've fired an email off to Bryan Carter - I'm hoping they'll respond quickly.

    The issue here is the court says that the order to provide the witness statement was in the same bundle of documents that the hearing date and mediation document was in. However, I've been fairly good at keeping all of my paperwork together and in this case I only have those two documents from that date.

    Whether this is an oversight on the part of the clerk at the court to put the paperwork into the envelope or if I genuinely have misplaced that portion I really could not say, (though i'm 99.9% certain I'd have kept and read the order had one been there)

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by illustriousmuz View Post
    OK So this morning I received another letter from Bryan Carter

    This time it's asking if I received the court order dated the 20th May 2015, This would be the order that stated to provide a witness statement. I do have a letter from the 20th May but all it says is notice of hearing and it's bundled with a document labeled EX730

    Does this mean they're possibly willing to agree to the set aside?

    I'm unsure whether to go ahead and just send the N244 form off with payment or if I should wait for another response from BC

    I think it may do. If you just received a single page with the hearing date, and the EX730 Mediation document then you have not been informed of the requirement for a witness statement. Yes I think emailing them in response and see if you get a response in the next day or two before filing your N244.

    Of course they could say you should have known a hearing notice meant a WS should be filed, and refuse consent. But worth a shot, will mean paying out only £50 rather than £155 for the application as it will be with consent and no need for a hearing.

    ( apologies btw I meant to go through it for you - see what they come back with on that first I think)

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    I'm about to post a reply to this letter but I'm aware of the time constraints approacing - I only have until the 23rd before this becomes enforceable

    I'm wondering if, for speed, I send a response to BC in an email? That should be trackable and would definitely be quicker than a regular letter. Of course, i'm basing this on the assumption that they're going to be agreeable to the application to set aside

    Another part of me is just thinking I should fire off the N244 application to the court

    What do you guys think? Does it sound like they might set aside? Or does it sound like they're stalling for time until they can apply to enforce?

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    OK So this morning I received another letter from Bryan Carter

    This time it's asking if I received the court order dated the 20th May 2015, This would be the order that stated to provide a witness statement. I do have a letter from the 20th May but all it says is notice of hearing and it's bundled with a document labeled EX730

    Does this mean they're possibly willing to agree to the set aside?

    I'm unsure whether to go ahead and just send the N244 form off with payment or if I should wait for another response from BC

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    The draft defence, would be the original defence, so you could send a copy of that with the application too, as the defence hasn't changed. The WS is basically saying why the judgment should be set aside, and as the order also asks for an order to produce it should spell out why. I'd attach the original Defence, original Witness statement as exhibits to the new, set aside, Witness statement.

    I'll go through it in a little bit Muz xx

    Leave a comment:


  • FlamingParrot
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by Amethyst View Post
    Paste up when you've put some bits in from your witness statement about s.78 etc and I'll go through it again for you xxx
    Wouldn't those bits go into his draft defence or do you think they should be in both the WS and draft defence?

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    OK I've put in the pertinent information from my original witness statement. This is what it reads like now

    CLAIM No: XXXXXX
    IN THE COUNTY COURT AT GATESHEAD
    BETWEEN:
    LOWELL PORTFOLIO LIMITED CLAIMAINT
    and
    ILLUSTRIOUSMUZ DEFENDANT
    WITNESS STATEMENT OF ILLUSTRIOUSMUZ
    I, IllustriousMuz, being the Defendant in this case make the following statement believing it to be true. I am a litigant in person

    1. I make this witness statement in support of the application for an order that the judgment in this case, Claim No. XXXXXX Judgment dated 25th September 2015 be set aside


    2. CPR 13.3 states (1) In any other case, the court may set aside or vary a judgment entered under Part 12 if –
    a. The defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim; or


    b. It appears to the court that there is some other good reason why –


    i. The judgement should be set aside or varied; or


    ii. The defendant should be allowed to defend the claim


    3. I have been responding to and defending this claim since I received a claims form on the 26th January 2015


    4. Although I received notice from the court of a hearing date, due for 1st October 2015, I did not see any further instructions from the court regarding the provision of a Witness Statement by a specific date


    5. On the 18th September 2015, I received a Witness Statement from the Claimants solicitors. Upon receiving this document, I decided to produce to my own witness statement and submit that to the court.


    6. On the 28th September I submitted my Witness Statement at Gateshead Court in the mailbox outside the main entrance.


    7. On the 30th September 2015 I received notice from the court that default judgment had been entered against me on the 25th September 2015 because my Witness Statement had not been filed in time


    8. On the 6th October 2015, I wrote to the claimant and the claimant’s solicitors explaining the situation and requested that they agree to set-aside the judgment and proceed back to a hearing.


    9. On the 14th October I received a letter from the claimants solicitors informing me that they had not heard from the court regarding the judgment and were therefore unable to agree or disagree to an application to set aside the judgment


    10. On 26th January 2015 I made a formal, written request to the Claimants solicitors requesting that the Claimant provides copies of all documents mentioned in the statement of the case [EXHIBIT A], pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 31.14


    11. On the 26th January 2015 I sent a formal request for the copy of the original agreement to the claimant [EXHIBIT B], pursuant to s.78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with a postal order for the statutory £1 fee.


    12. I am still awaiting the claimant to comply with s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s.78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement until they have complied with requests for all pertinent documentation.


    13. Civil Procedure Rule 31.15 requires documents are provided within 7 days from receipt of a written request. The claimant has failed to provide any of the documents I have requested.


    14. Around the beginning of May 2015, I telephoned the Claimants solicitors to try and resolve matters. I mentioned the failure to comply with my requests for documentation to be told by the lady I was speaking to that they don’t respond to those requests on the grounds that the original creditor should have provided the information. They made no representation to me that they had not received the requests but were simply ignoring them


    15. On the 18th September 2015 I received a Witness Statement from the Claimants solicitors.


    16. The Claimants Witness Statement denies having received any documentation from me. This is the first time that I have been made aware of this despite speaking on the telephone to the Claimants solicitors.


    17. The Claimants Witness Statement contains a purported Notice of Assignment, dated 15th October 2013. This is the first time I have seen this document and deny receiving any such document.


    18. The Claimants Witness Statement contains a purported letter from the original creditor, also dated 15th October 2013, notifying me of the assignment. This is the first time I have seen this document and deny receiving any such document.


    19. The Claimants Witness Statement, Paragraph 6, declares that the account “Fell into default 2nd October 2013” and that “A default notice would have been sent to the defendant at the time”. I deny receiving a Default Notice.


    20. The Claimants Witness Statement, Paragraph 7, declares “the debt was assigned to the claimant on or around 4th October 2013. However, under s.87 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a default notice should be issued giving the debtor at least 14 days to remedy the breach from when the notice is served and cannot be assigned until the 14 days have elapsed.


    21. Under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) where the claim includes a money claim, a defendant shall be taken to require that any allegation relating to the amount of money claimed be proved unless he expressly admits the allegation. Therefore it is expected that the Claimant be required to prove the allegation that the money is owed as claimed by providing pertinent documentation which has yet to be delivered to me.


    22. The Defendant submits that the Claimant does not have a valid claim because the Claimant has failed to meet all obligations under Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4) and failed to comply with Civil Procedure Rule 31.14


    23. The Defendant submits that the Claimant does not have a valid claim because the Claimant has failed to comply with s.78(1)/s.78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act


    24. The Defendant submits that the Claimant does not have a valid claim because the Claimant and the Original creditor have, by their own admission, breached s.87 of the Consumer Credit Act by assigning the debt before any statutory default notice period has elapsed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Paste up when you've put some bits in from your witness statement about s.78 etc and I'll go through it again for you xxx

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Awesome stuff! Thank You so much!!!

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X