• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Thanks for replying everyone

    I've not heard back from Carters/Lowell but I'm filling my application form out now and about to draft my witness statement to attach to it. I have a few questions

    In section 3 I have said
    An order that the default judgment in this case be set aside under CPR13.3. I was unaware that I needed to submit a witness statment to the court pursuant to an order dated 20th May 2015 and only submitted one after receiving one from the claimaints solicitors on the 18th September 2015
    Does that sound OK?

    Question 5 on the form asks "How do you want to have this application dealt with?" I've been reading that you should usually just tick without a hearing. Is this correct? The demo form flamingParrot linked me to has hearing ticked. Unsure what to do here.

    If I do tick at a hearing, what level of judge do I need?

    Also, when I send this off, do i send the £155 payment with it or do I wait until Carter/Lowell agree or disagree to the request?
    Last edited by illustriousmuz; 8th October 2015, 10:16:AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • FlamingParrot
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by illustriousmuz View Post
    My concern is that they are now aware that I am seeking to have their default judgement overturned and will rush something through in an attempt to beat me to filing my N244

    But I guess I can rest a bit easier now.
    What could they rush through?

    Originally posted by illustriousmuz View Post
    Hi guys, quick question

    I have written to BC/Lowell and am awaiting a response.

    The court says I should pay the default judgement by the 23rd October. I'm concerned that BC/Lowell will make efforts to enforce this sooner? Is that possible?
    No, they can't just enforce a judgment by themselves. They'll have to apply to the court for either an attachment of earnings order (only applicable if you work for an employer) or a warrant of control. Their applications wouldn't be considered before the date set by the court and either way, you'd receive notice if they were to apply to enforce after that date. Do get your N244 in as soon as you can, the court also takes into account how promptly you acted in requesting a set aside as soon as you were aware of the judgment. :thumb:

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by illustriousmuz View Post
    My concern is that they are now aware that I am seeking to have their default judgement overturned and will rush something through in an attempt to beat me to filing my N244

    But I guess I can rest a bit easier now.
    Makes no odds get the set aside application in, line up your defence to the
    original claim.
    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
    If you pay by the 23rd the judgement wont be recorded.

    Carter should remind you that the judgement amount is payable.
    If you have not heard by Thursday e-mail Carter with a chase up.

    nem
    My concern is that they are now aware that I am seeking to have their default judgement overturned and will rush something through in an attempt to beat me to filing my N244

    But I guess I can rest a bit easier now.

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by illustriousmuz View Post
    Hi guys, quick question

    I have written to BC/Lowell and am awaiting a response.

    The court says I should pay the default judgement by the 23rd October. I'm concerned that BC/Lowell will make efforts to enforce this sooner? Is that possible?
    If you pay by the 23rd the judgement wont be recorded.

    Carter should remind you that the judgement amount is payable.
    If you have not heard by Thursday e-mail Carter with a chase up.

    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • Berniethebolt
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    As far as i am aware, no enforcement can be taken before a date set by the court so you should be ok. I am positive someone will pop up soon and confirm

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Hi guys, quick question

    I have written to BC/Lowell and am awaiting a response.

    The court says I should pay the default judgement by the 23rd October. I'm concerned that BC/Lowell will make efforts to enforce this sooner? Is that possible?

    Leave a comment:


  • illustriousmuz
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Thanks for all your replies everyone. I was knocked sick by this yesterday and genuinely thought I was going to have a heart attack at one point. I'm feeling better today though so I'm on this now to try and get it rectified.

    Originally posted by Berniethebolt View Post
    The whole subject of live accounts being sold has been discussed at great length on many forums . The consensus is that a live account can only be sold to someone with the appropriate licence however many companies do contract out debt collecting to DCA's. particularly utility companies when the account is still live .Sometimes it is a day or so before you are contacted. I was contacted a few years ago by the lovely BCW for about £20 owed to Eon
    I know in this case that the debt was sold under the presumption that the account had defaulted. They may very well have sent a default notice but I don't recall ever getting one and I'd been on the phone a number of times to the original creditor to keep them appraised of my work situation. Had one arrived on my door, especially around the time that I'd been offered employment starting in October 2013 I would have made attempts to put things right like I had with other creditors. In fact, my first pay day I started clearing my OD with the bank and other bills; I wouldn't have just left this.

    My point though has been that I can't get an answer as to when the account was defaulted. The best I can go by is what BC sent in their witness statement which doesn't exactly say when the account was considered defaulted but did say that the account had "fell into default" on the 2nd October - to my mind, that sounds like the time at which notice should have been sent to me and I could have rectified the issue then. I don't think I'll ever get an answer

    I'm writing to BC today to ask if they'll agree to a set-aside, I'm not holding my breath though

    Leave a comment:


  • FlamingParrot
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by Berniethebolt View Post
    The whole subject of live accounts being sold has been discussed at great length on many forums . The consensus is that a live account can only be sold to someone with the appropriate licence however many companies do contract out debt collecting to DCA's. particularly utility companies when the account is still live .Sometimes it is a day or so before you are contacted. I was contacted a few years ago by the lovely BCW for about £20 owed to Eon
    Sorry, I should have clarified, I was referring to accounts regulated by the CCA where there is a requirement for a DN before the account is terminated and sold or passed on for collection. Water companies can't disconnect you so the account stays live (although they do try the empty property letter trick ) but they do pass on the arrears to debt collectors.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berniethebolt
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    The whole subject of live accounts being sold has been discussed at great length on many forums . The consensus is that a live account can only be sold to someone with the appropriate licence however many companies do contract out debt collecting to DCA's. particularly utility companies when the account is still live .Sometimes it is a day or so before you are contacted. I was contacted a few years ago by the lovely BCW for about £20 owed to Eon

    Leave a comment:


  • FlamingParrot
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by judgemental24 View Post
    Bernie has made an intersting point

    for example how can you sell a live credit card account to a DCA when a DCA does not allow credit facilities??
    Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
    Debt purchasers as opposed to Debt Collection Agencies.
    I should think a live account can't be assigned to either of the above, just to another company running credit cards such as Egg selling to Barclaycard, Citi to Opus, etc.

    A live account couldn't be passed on to a DCA for collection either.

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by judgemental24 View Post
    Bernie has made an intersting point

    for example how can you sell a live credit card account to a DCA when a DCA does not allow credit facilities??
    Debt purchasers as opposed to Debt Collection Agencies.

    nem

    Leave a comment:


  • judgemental24
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by Berniethebolt View Post
    As far as I am aware, an account has to be terminated prior to sale because debt purchasers do not have a CCL that allows them to provide ongoing credit. if an agreement does not have a way of contractually terminating the agreement without the need for a DN then the agreement should not be sold without a DN then termination.
    Of course with a fixed term loan , and that can be a bank loan or a PDL once the term is up the agreement can be terminated and hence sold.
    Bernie has made an intersting point

    for example how can you sell a live credit card account to a DCA when a DCA does not allow credit facilities??

    Leave a comment:


  • FlamingParrot
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    Originally posted by Berniethebolt View Post
    As far as I am aware, an account has to be terminated prior to sale because debt purchasers do not have a CCL that allows them to provide ongoing credit. if an agreement does not have a way of contractually terminating the agreement without the need for a DN then the agreement should not be sold without a DN then termination.
    Of course with a fixed term loan , and that can be a bank loan or a PDL once the term is up the agreement can be terminated and hence sold.
    Yes, s.87 of the CCA says that a DN is required before the creditor can terminate the agreement:
    87 Need for default notice.

    (1)Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice ”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

    (a)to terminate the agreement, or
    Originally posted by nemesis45 View Post
    A DN must give the specific date by which the account must be returned to " normal " status not just stating " 14 days " to remedy the default.
    Yes, they need to give a date, however, as per my post above, if the defendant hasn't got their own copy of the DN, there will be no way of establishing whether it was compliant or not because the banks don't keep copies, just records of when they were sent, but not what the actual wording on the DN was. Sadly most people wouldn't have kept their DNs.

    Leave a comment:


  • nemesis45
    replied
    Re: Court Caste Lowell/Bryan Carter - Worried sick

    A DN must give the specific date by which the account must be returned to " normal " status not just stating " 14 days " to remedy the default.

    nem

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X