• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Precarious Position after CCJ Set-Aside

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Precarious Position after CCJ Set-Aside

    Hi all,

    I had a CCJ entered against me last year for a £430 Capital One debt (now owned by Lowell, with Overdales acting). 2 days ago I had it set aside under CPR 13.3 due to exceptional circumstances (I was in an abusive relationship and didn’t receive the claim, and the debt was accrued under coercive control and economic abuse.) I provided evidence including a police report and DMHEF.

    At the hearing, the judge set it aside and noted that both limbs of 13.3 were met. Overdales had already written to the court confirming they wouldn’t attend or enforce, but that they oppose the set-aside. She set-aside anyway and she gave no directions after setting it aside. Just told me it’ll be removed from registry and I’ll get the order as proof.

    Now I’m left in limbo. The CCJ is gone (waiting on the order), but I’m unsure where that leaves me:
    • Does the claim just sit there stayed now?
    • Could Lowell revive it at any point, even months from now?
    • Do I wait to hear from Overdales or Lowell?
    • I want to engage and ideally seek a write-off due to vulnerability, but I’m scared that contacting them will push them to reissue the claim.

    Lowell have written off a different debt of mine due to the circumstances and removed the default but said they couldn’t on this one because of the CCJ. Well… that’s now gone.

    I’d appreciate advice on how to proceed without triggering litigation again, but still move towards resolving the debt.

    Thanks in advance, it’s been a long road.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    a) Does the claim just sit there stayed now?

    Set a side means that the Judgement has gone, but claim still exists and needs to be dealt with.

    b) Could Lowell revive it at any point, even months from now?

    They objected to the 'set a side', so could pursue it.

    c) Do I wait to hear from Overdales or Lowell?

    I wouldn't wait to hear from them.

    d) I want to engage and ideally seek a write-off due to vulnerability, but I’m scared that contacting them will push them to reissue the claim.

    They don't need to reissue the claim as this claim still exists, so send them a write-off letter, explain your circumstances.

    Mark the letter 'Without Prejudice - Save as to Costs'. The Judge's decision will help in the sense that, there were genuine
    reasons why the Judge 'set a side' the claim.

    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/de...debt---letter/

    Make sure you get Proof of Postage.

    Comment

    View our Terms and Conditions

    LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

    If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


    If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
    Working...
    X