To be fair I only said look into JR, I didn't say it's a definite. It was qualified.
Without knowing the building and the plans for it, all anyone can offer is generic advice. For all we know, the roof's about to cave in, the subfloors are half-eaten damp sponges, and the electrics are condemned.
Your defence at the hearing could be based on points of law and policy, but they'll amount to nothing if the building is unsafe or has been sold.
As I suggested, you could've approached various people to determine if there's any prospect of the building being repurposed. That's not a legal action, but it's not going to harm your position if you've tried dialogue.
Without knowing the building and the plans for it, all anyone can offer is generic advice. For all we know, the roof's about to cave in, the subfloors are half-eaten damp sponges, and the electrics are condemned.
Your defence at the hearing could be based on points of law and policy, but they'll amount to nothing if the building is unsafe or has been sold.
As I suggested, you could've approached various people to determine if there's any prospect of the building being repurposed. That's not a legal action, but it's not going to harm your position if you've tried dialogue.


Comment