Dilemma over CCJ and huge solicitors' charges

[Kathy321]

Thankyou everyone. I think I have all I need now to get the ball rolling. Tonight I will sit down and draft a fabulous witness statement!

[Pezza54]

I've just realised you will have problems drafting your defence. You haven't seen the Particulars of Claim so you cannot respond in detail to items in the claim. If you write it now based on the solicitor's letter you could be asked how you managed to write a defence without seeing the PoC

[Kathy321]

Do I get the Particulars of Claim from the CCBC in Northampton or the solicitors?

I don't think I can wait 2 weeks to see if it is in my postbox, as if it is not there then I have just wasted time. I have read that once you find out about a CCJ (2 days ago), the court expects you to put your application in swiftly to have it set aside, ie. in around 7 days or so.

[Pezza54]

If CCBC didn't give you the claim number you will have to phone them again. You could ask if they will email you the claim form (the PoC is probably on the claim form)
It is more important to file your N244 asap. You could just attach your witness statement and evidence and state in the box your defence will follow after you have received the claim form and poc

[Kathy321]

Hi PEZZA54

Northampton CCBC have emailed me some details today. The top part of their email was the claimant, claim number and name of the claimants solicitor. I have cut and pasted the POC below. It just looks like a series of monetary amounts they are demanding. I do not know how this would help me write a defence any more than what we have already discussed in the posts above. All opinions welcome from you and previous people who have posted! Thankyou.

Judgment amount: £23XX.XX
Particulars of claim: D IS THE LEASEHOLD OWNER OF APARTMENT XXXX (address deleted by me). D DID COVENANT WITH C TO CONTRIBUTE AND PAY UPON DEMAND A GROUND RENT AT THE TIMES AND IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE LEASE. D FAILED TO PAY THE SUM DUE WHEN DEMANDED. THE SUM HAVING FALLEN DUE AND WHICH REMAINS UNPAID IS £2XX.XX. FURTHER AND IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE C CLAIMS CONTRACTUAL INTEREST ON EACH DEMAND FROM THE DATE THE SAME FELL DUE AT A RATE OF 4% ABOVE BASE RATE OF BARCLAYS BANK AMOUNTING TO £4.19, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST ACCRUING AT A DAILY RATE OF £0.03 UNTIL JUDGMENT OR PAYMENT IN FULL. C ALSO CLAIMS COSTS OF £18XX.XX INCURRED TO DATE IN THE RECOVERY OF THE PRINCIPAL SUM ON A CONTRACTUAL OR IMPLIED BASIS. C CLAIMS COSTS INCURRED HEREAFTER ON THE SAME BASIS.

[Pezza54]

Now you can tick all 3 boxes, defence, witness statement, evidence on N244

Keep your defence short. Call yourself the defendant admit to owing the missed £100 payment plus accrued interest.
If that is all you owed (now paid), deny the £2XX outstanding amount as not correct
Strongly deny you owe the £`18XX claimed by the claimant for costs. The high amount of costs is unjustified and not proved by the claimant

There is an example of a witness statement under "SHORTCUTS" on the righthand side of this page

Your witness statement, short consecutively numbered paras in chronological order (date first) should cover your ground rent contract, the time and amount of regular payments, the date you failed to pay one month and the reason why, any correspondence you received, when you paid the missed payment
Also your letter to the solicitor, the date you vacated your property, any evidence you were not living there, the date you intend to return

End your witness statement and evidence with a signed statement of truth

[Kathy321]

The £2XX outstanding amount is my ground rent of £100, plus £180 late payment fee (although they call it an 'admin fee') added by the ground rent company before they passed my debt on to the solicitors. So it is not incorrect of the solicitors to quote this amount. I have only paid the £100 ground rent so far though.

A stupid question: In box 9 on form N244, it asks 'Who should be served with this application?' Is this the solicitors, or the original ground rent company? I asked the CCBC what to write in that box, but they told me that they cannot give legal advice. I didn't think that would count as legal advice!

[Pezza54]

The solicitor should be served

[atticus]

The other party, i.e. the claimant, should be named; service will be on his solicitor.