• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Judgment creditor onto his fourth writ of control!

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judgment creditor onto his fourth writ of control!

    My Judgment creditor has been handed back their case by Marstons twice now as no goods or assets could be recovered, the second time this happened they did away with Marstons services. The main issues being that welfare was highlighted and Marstons had to work within the law on that. How can he threaten further bailiff action and apply to the court for a further writ of control if this was the case previously with Marstons? Any other debt collector would have to work within the same laws and under the TCG Act and behave accordingly!
    Tags: None

  • #2
    not true sadly. bailiff companiues have different rules and thresholds for welfare. The most brute force onces do the bare minimum and arguably bend the rules.

    he may well go to another company, probably a more "brute force" style.

    Marstons are terrible for enforcement though, and do the bare minimum for creditors. They make pathetic efforts at best.

    Comment


    • #3
      Understood, but I would still be arguing under the Equality and Diversity Act 2010 that any other firms activities are illegal. Given the circumstances of disability and third parties involved etc Agents are still answerable to the courts in their activities and work under licensed conditions!

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe your creditor believes that persistence will pay its rewards, in the same way that you appear determined not to pay.
        Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.

        Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :

        https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by CPR88 View Post
          Understood, but I would still be arguing under the Equality and Diversity Act 2010 that any other firms activities are illegal. Given the circumstances of disability and third parties involved etc Agents are still answerable to the courts in their activities and work under licensed conditions!
          no they are entitled to do so they have a high court writ

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X