I had been the victim of unfair dismissal where a fake handwriting expert apparently proved (strong likeness which is good for criminal court cases) that handwriting matched mine on an alleged document. I know it's not my handwriting, so I questioned the employer about the expert witness's qualification and all I was given was his CV. The only qualification listed in his CV was a Diploma in Handwriting, which in itself does not make him an expert, but even then the college it was attained from does not seem to exist in the UK. So I asked my employer to clarify from the expert about the details of this college, address, website etc. The CEO told me in the appeal that the expert did not respond to further information, and he thought that an expert does not need to prove their expertise and he understands why he had not responded to clarifications about his qualifications. Is this right?
I have thought of making a money claim against this expert for loss of job, but my husband says that this could be very costly depending on the amount claimed. So to save costs, I am thinking of just bringing this expert into a court of law for him to prove his expertise. Can this be done without too much cost or risk of costs?
Many thanks for your help.
I have thought of making a money claim against this expert for loss of job, but my husband says that this could be very costly depending on the amount claimed. So to save costs, I am thinking of just bringing this expert into a court of law for him to prove his expertise. Can this be done without too much cost or risk of costs?
Many thanks for your help.


Comment