• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

The Scary Letters.... RLP and DWF

Collapse
Loading...
Important !
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: The Scary Letters.... RLP and DWF

    Notice given by some stores to suspected shoplifters at the time of the incident.

    2018-09-24 09_45_39-Start.png

    More letters - one from RLP entitled 'Letter before Claim' with associated FAQs and 'how to pay'

    Attached Files
    #staysafestayhome

    Any support I provide is offered without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

    Received a Court Claim? Read >>>>> First Steps

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: The Scary Letters.... RLP and DWF

      I note how well it complies with new Pre action protocol !!

      Comment


      • #18
        If you ignore the civil recovery company long enough, will the actual client take action against you?

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Mat123 View Post
          If you ignore the civil recovery company long enough, will the actual client take action against you?
          Never had action by retailer posted on here to my knowledge not worth their time

          Comment


          • #20
            RLP tried once, got badly spanked by the court and haven't tried again since. Look for Oxford and RLP

            Comment


            • #21
              Although I’m curious... if people just ignore these demands from RLP, wont the retailers not get any recourse?

              Comment


              • #22
                It's not the retailers wanting the money it's the companies and they can not take it to court themselves because it was not their loss.

                Comment


                • #23
                  If the retailers don’t get the money, why would they engage RLP? More as a deterrent against future acts?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    They engage them for their security "Expertise". (The power of the hard sell!). RLP are looking for a bit extra cash above what they have been paid by the retailer. If the goods have been recovered then the argument that money has been lost in dealing with the incident doesn't hold water because the RLP staff would have been paid anyway even if there wasn't an incident to deal with, ie they were doing what they were being paid to do.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      That’s the thing. If the retailer pays RLP to engage them to recover sums of money that they hope (and expect) will be more than what they pay.....surely they will not be happy if RLP isn’t able to recover it?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I doubt the retailers will actually see much (if any) of the money rlp manage to get out of people. Once it's been passed on to rlp the retailer has basically washed their hands of it anyway
                        Debt is like any other trap, easy enough to get into, but hard enough to get out of.

                        It doesn't matter where your journey begins, so long as you begin it...

                        recte agens confido

                        ~~~~~

                        Any advice I provide is given without liability, if you are unsure please seek professional legal guidance.

                        I can be emailed if you need my help loading pictures/documents to your thread. My email address is Kati@legalbeagles.info
                        But please include a link to your thread so I know who you are.

                        Specialist advice can be sought via our sister site JustBeagle

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          what this country runs on = call centres and ambulance chasers also money making ideas from un-suspecting people, FCA etc useless see how many companies they state are cloned yet they do nothing only warn people not to use hem - yet they can operate,, go back to the days of English Shop keepers not some conglomerates

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            How on earth is a shop or RLP going to establish evidentially that the action of a particular shoplifter on a particular occasion was the cause of the prevention procedures that the shop already has in place?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Have a look at the "Oxford Case"

                              They tried that then and got smacked down.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ostell View Post
                                Have a look at the "Oxford Case"

                                They tried that then and got smacked down.
                                So I understand. I'm expressing astonishment that anyone who'd done the LPC or the Bar course could think otherwise.

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X