boots shoplifting rlp

[jaguarsuk]

Re: boots shoplifting rlp

I'm amazed this is still rumbling on

[warwick65]

Re: boots shoplifting rlp

I have just read the article by the BBC and I agree with Nick, it is entirely wrong to try and stifle freedom of expression even if this causes a financial loss to a company. If the expression is not justified then it is just as easy counter

That horrible little man who runs Ryanair seems to think, there is no such thing as bad publicity

[des8]

Re: boots shoplifting rlp

I'm amazed this is still rumbling on

Only started at beginning of July.
RLP keep the pressure up for months.

[warwick65]

Re: boots shoplifting rlp

You have to wonder where they get these figures from
As far as I can see they suffered no loss of goods and maybe an hour of a security guards time which is probably minimum wage with payroll taxes say £10

I think the fact the letter refers to a deterrent indicates that they are after punitive damages as the yanks say

Tell them to go whistle ( actually don't tell them anything , just ignore)


On a separate note, I wonder if there are cases where the relentless harassment of RLP has led to damages to the individual , at the least extreme, stress causing loss of work and at the most extreme - well those of us old enough will remember Lady Isobel Barnett

[des8]

Re: boots shoplifting rlp

[QUOTE

On a separate note, I wonder if there are cases where the relentless harassment of RLP has led to damages to the individual , at the least extreme, stress causing loss of work and at the most extreme - well those of us old enough will remember Lady Isobel Barnett[/QUOTE]

Which is why I label the actions of civil recovery firms as more despicable than those of the shoplifters they pursue.