Good afternoon
I purchased a T30 Van from a Garage (1 man ownership, he’s a mechanic and yard full of VW’s that he sells, on November 19th for £13,995. This money was sent faster payments as this was his method was.
When we (me, my husband and our 4 young children) went to view the van, we both asked very specific questions about whether the van had any engine leaks, parts of engine which needed replacing, anything wrong with engine, running etc. We were told each time no it was a good working van. My husband took it for a drive around the block and said it drove fine. It was raining at the time and when he used the wipers they made a screeching sound. He asked about that and was told the motor needed oiling or it needed replacing, easy and cheap to do. So again he asked anything else wrong with the van. No was the response.
We purchased and my husband drove it back and I followed in our car.
I noticed lots of smoke coming out of exhaust when following him back. Then about 4 days later it took 3 turns of key to start. This each day on first engine turn over. Once it warmed you could start straight away. Still lots of smoke out of exhaust. I also noticed tyres looked worn. I took van to Tyre shop and they informed me three needed changing as were at legal limits. Lovely, already spending money. When they looked the one alloy was cracked which was dangerous for driving. I had to purchase 4 wheels and 4 tyres to drive van away. Whilst they had van I asked the to check underneath to see if everything looked ok. Was told upon collection, engine leak and passenger CV boot needed replacing. They also had to cut the second skin off the exhaust as it was dragging on floor. Also when driving the one sliding window in the sliding door would open on it’s own. When I checked you can open from outside so the latch on inside is not working/broken.
I telephoned the Proprietor on the Tuesday 22nd Nov to initially tell him about the window not securing properly, the smoke out of exhaust and moaned about having to pay for 4 wheels and tyres. He said he would take van and look at smoking and try and fix window.
I said there would be a delay because we were due to move that coming weekend and didn’t have the time to drive back to him in Wales (1.5 hrs). He said he would reserve himself to look at van w/c December.
In the meantime I discovered other faults through the next days, engine not starting until 3-4 turns of key, sluggish and jumping, engine fan kept kicking in and no air con was running, this fan would run even from first starting engine and brakes didn’t feel right. We took the decision to reject the vehicle and request a refund as more and more faults were showing themselves. This done 1 week after purchase.
I wrote to him via Ebay (he has classified ads on here) and requested a refund due to more problems arising with the van. I stated under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 I can reject and request refund under 30 days.
He wrote back by letter and suggested I was scamming him and that I had damaged the van. Pardon me I think other way around.
So this is where letters were being sent.
I arranged for a Dekra Engineer to come and inspect the van and write a report. Not good and he said it should not have been sold to me in that condition, dangerous vehicle. The conclusion of report:
“
The poor starting/starter motor condition is progressive mechanical wear and tear, together with the excessive plumes of exhaust smoke which, in the opinion of the engineer, is indicative of excessive internal turbo wear and internal engine wear. The heavy oil soiling to the oil filler neck suggests that previous frequent oil top ups have been necessary indicating excessive oil usage.
In the opinion of the engineer, all above defects were present at point of sale, together with the missing right front brake caliper clip, split left front outer driveshaft gaiter and the cracked right front alloy road wheel, due to the dirt ingress to the cracked area.
The vehicle in its present state is not fit for purpose and is in a dangerous condition.
“
We sent another letter to include report and again request refund.
He is still stating no refund, will collect vehicle and repair if necessary and leave a courtesy vehicle. He said that he has sought legal advice and this is more than acceptable for age and mileage of vehicle and he does not have to refund. The van is 2007 on £140K and cost £13,995. At point of purchase my husband and I continually asked him is there anything wrong with vehicle as we have been burnt before, leaks, engine problems, running etc – he repeatedly told us that it was a great vehicle with no problems other than the screechy motor on wipers.
I contacted Citizen Advice and they said I can reject and request refund under 30 days – which we did week after purchase.
We sent another letter stating that if he still refuses to refund he leaves us no choice but to take him to court. This had no effect and he is still not prepared to refund us.
We do not trust him to repair the vehicle since he sold it in this state to start with, which is why we want the refund. How can we trust him to fix everything genuinely, there is a lot wrong with it.
1. So what I need to know is can I request refund and not accept his offer of repair?
2. The letters and report we have sent him (lettered him 6 times for refund request) – will this be sufficient evidence that we have tried to gain refund?
3. Faster payments with his name as reference – is this sufficient as proof of purchase? He only gave me the V5/2 slip. The van is in my name as do have the V5 logbook now.
4. Any information or advice about proceeding to court?
5. Can I also claim my losses – tax, insurance along with legal fees which I have to pay to take him to court?
6. Is my only option to get it fixed and trust that he does it genuinely?
Any advice/information gratefully received.
Many thanks
I purchased a T30 Van from a Garage (1 man ownership, he’s a mechanic and yard full of VW’s that he sells, on November 19th for £13,995. This money was sent faster payments as this was his method was.
When we (me, my husband and our 4 young children) went to view the van, we both asked very specific questions about whether the van had any engine leaks, parts of engine which needed replacing, anything wrong with engine, running etc. We were told each time no it was a good working van. My husband took it for a drive around the block and said it drove fine. It was raining at the time and when he used the wipers they made a screeching sound. He asked about that and was told the motor needed oiling or it needed replacing, easy and cheap to do. So again he asked anything else wrong with the van. No was the response.
We purchased and my husband drove it back and I followed in our car.
I noticed lots of smoke coming out of exhaust when following him back. Then about 4 days later it took 3 turns of key to start. This each day on first engine turn over. Once it warmed you could start straight away. Still lots of smoke out of exhaust. I also noticed tyres looked worn. I took van to Tyre shop and they informed me three needed changing as were at legal limits. Lovely, already spending money. When they looked the one alloy was cracked which was dangerous for driving. I had to purchase 4 wheels and 4 tyres to drive van away. Whilst they had van I asked the to check underneath to see if everything looked ok. Was told upon collection, engine leak and passenger CV boot needed replacing. They also had to cut the second skin off the exhaust as it was dragging on floor. Also when driving the one sliding window in the sliding door would open on it’s own. When I checked you can open from outside so the latch on inside is not working/broken.
I telephoned the Proprietor on the Tuesday 22nd Nov to initially tell him about the window not securing properly, the smoke out of exhaust and moaned about having to pay for 4 wheels and tyres. He said he would take van and look at smoking and try and fix window.
I said there would be a delay because we were due to move that coming weekend and didn’t have the time to drive back to him in Wales (1.5 hrs). He said he would reserve himself to look at van w/c December.
In the meantime I discovered other faults through the next days, engine not starting until 3-4 turns of key, sluggish and jumping, engine fan kept kicking in and no air con was running, this fan would run even from first starting engine and brakes didn’t feel right. We took the decision to reject the vehicle and request a refund as more and more faults were showing themselves. This done 1 week after purchase.
I wrote to him via Ebay (he has classified ads on here) and requested a refund due to more problems arising with the van. I stated under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 I can reject and request refund under 30 days.
He wrote back by letter and suggested I was scamming him and that I had damaged the van. Pardon me I think other way around.
So this is where letters were being sent.
I arranged for a Dekra Engineer to come and inspect the van and write a report. Not good and he said it should not have been sold to me in that condition, dangerous vehicle. The conclusion of report:
“
The poor starting/starter motor condition is progressive mechanical wear and tear, together with the excessive plumes of exhaust smoke which, in the opinion of the engineer, is indicative of excessive internal turbo wear and internal engine wear. The heavy oil soiling to the oil filler neck suggests that previous frequent oil top ups have been necessary indicating excessive oil usage.
In the opinion of the engineer, all above defects were present at point of sale, together with the missing right front brake caliper clip, split left front outer driveshaft gaiter and the cracked right front alloy road wheel, due to the dirt ingress to the cracked area.
The vehicle in its present state is not fit for purpose and is in a dangerous condition.
“
We sent another letter to include report and again request refund.
He is still stating no refund, will collect vehicle and repair if necessary and leave a courtesy vehicle. He said that he has sought legal advice and this is more than acceptable for age and mileage of vehicle and he does not have to refund. The van is 2007 on £140K and cost £13,995. At point of purchase my husband and I continually asked him is there anything wrong with vehicle as we have been burnt before, leaks, engine problems, running etc – he repeatedly told us that it was a great vehicle with no problems other than the screechy motor on wipers.
I contacted Citizen Advice and they said I can reject and request refund under 30 days – which we did week after purchase.
We sent another letter stating that if he still refuses to refund he leaves us no choice but to take him to court. This had no effect and he is still not prepared to refund us.
We do not trust him to repair the vehicle since he sold it in this state to start with, which is why we want the refund. How can we trust him to fix everything genuinely, there is a lot wrong with it.
1. So what I need to know is can I request refund and not accept his offer of repair?
2. The letters and report we have sent him (lettered him 6 times for refund request) – will this be sufficient evidence that we have tried to gain refund?
3. Faster payments with his name as reference – is this sufficient as proof of purchase? He only gave me the V5/2 slip. The van is in my name as do have the V5 logbook now.
4. Any information or advice about proceeding to court?
5. Can I also claim my losses – tax, insurance along with legal fees which I have to pay to take him to court?
6. Is my only option to get it fixed and trust that he does it genuinely?
Any advice/information gratefully received.
Many thanks
Comment