Posting this on behalf of someone who was investigated by the DWP and interviewed under caution on suspicion of benefits fraud. The person in question has been cleared after the investigation but would like to find out what went on. The DWP decided to investigate because he agreed to do short term bookings when he was signing on. He always declared the work he did, but his claim was handled by their offices in Belfast, which are notoriously inefficient and often misplaced the paperwork supplied by his local JC. :rant:
He was also on receipt of HB but there was a £200/month shortfall and he had to obtain loans from family members to make up for it. The DWP didn't ask him to supply bank statements on a regular basis, instead they asked Santander to provide them directly to the DWP without his knowledge. He was IUCd in 2011 over his claim in 2009 and presented with statements from Santander, showing money going in. He explained everything to their satisfaction, and the case was closed, but he would like to find out what information was exchanged.
Would it be best to SAR Santander, the DWP, or both?
He was also on receipt of HB but there was a £200/month shortfall and he had to obtain loans from family members to make up for it. The DWP didn't ask him to supply bank statements on a regular basis, instead they asked Santander to provide them directly to the DWP without his knowledge. He was IUCd in 2011 over his claim in 2009 and presented with statements from Santander, showing money going in. He explained everything to their satisfaction, and the case was closed, but he would like to find out what information was exchanged.
Would it be best to SAR Santander, the DWP, or both?
Comment