Guys I am new to this forum but could do with a little help with M&S &More card ppi. Original Chargecard purchased 1986 with ppi, suffered injury 1995 made sucsessful claim. Am disabled and have not worked due to injury, employment medically terminated 1997. 2003 unsolicited &More credit card upgrade, cover stated replacement cards, charge cards cancelled, balance automatically transferred to &More account. Rang to complain, told upgrade mandatory, keeping charge card not an option, outstanding balance already transferred & ppi set up, queried ppi due to being unemployed due to disability told ppi set up as I had it on old card.
Defence to ppi claim is no pre existing injury and that ppi falls outside of OFT ruling so the upgrade is to existing insurance product and not a new policy,
PPI continued to cover credit line on same basis as previously is a continuation of cover
Basically can restricted Charge card PPI cover agreed to within a chargecard agreement be transferred to a unrestricted unsolicited credit card?
My view is that if the OFT intended to exempt PPI from their 2003 ruling they would have stated it within their ruling. Surely if PPI is purchased via a tick box in a Chargecard agreement it is part of the agreement and is non transferable to a credit card without a new compliant agreement.
Anyone know of PPI case setting precedent or what regulations apply
Any advice greatly appreciated,
Defence to ppi claim is no pre existing injury and that ppi falls outside of OFT ruling so the upgrade is to existing insurance product and not a new policy,
PPI continued to cover credit line on same basis as previously is a continuation of cover
Basically can restricted Charge card PPI cover agreed to within a chargecard agreement be transferred to a unrestricted unsolicited credit card?
My view is that if the OFT intended to exempt PPI from their 2003 ruling they would have stated it within their ruling. Surely if PPI is purchased via a tick box in a Chargecard agreement it is part of the agreement and is non transferable to a credit card without a new compliant agreement.
Anyone know of PPI case setting precedent or what regulations apply
Any advice greatly appreciated,
Comment