Hi
This is my first post and appologies if my question has previously been asked but my question surrounds my PPI claim with Lloyds.
I have made a recent claim with LLoyds for 5 policies for which i believe i was missold PPI for and which stem back to 1999 onwards.
As i had no original policy information/documents relating to these policies i enquired and they confirmed that i had indeed had 5 policies with them and that they would send me a claims form which i duly completed and returned.
Since then I recieved 2 telephone calls asking to discuss the claim, Both at time when i was at work therefore i asked them to ring back at alternative time.
I wasn't sure what the purpose of this call was but they never contacted me again until this morning when i recieved my decision letter.
They have stated in the letter that loan 1 was upheld and that due to them no longer having any detailed records relating to the loan and in the absence of them they have stated "in a genuine attempt to resolve your complaint our offer for this loan is equal to our average compensatory payment, we believe that an average payment methid in cases such as yours is fair and reasonable" they have therefore stated a payment of £1015 + 8% interest less tax =£1615.
On all the other 4 loans which go back to c 1999 they have stated that they have considered all aspects of the suitability of the policy including value for money/refinanced or repaid loans and that i was made aware of the optional nature of the PPI policy and that the PPI didn't improve the chances of your loan application being accepted.
I cannot understand how they can pay out on a loan which they have no evidence or documentation for but defend the 4 for which i was missold?
Could you someone advise where i stand in terms of what i should do next in terms of rejecting their offer?
Is this standard practice for banks to rebuff claims offering a small degree of compensation?
Any advice as to how best i proceed would be much appreciated?
This is my first post and appologies if my question has previously been asked but my question surrounds my PPI claim with Lloyds.
I have made a recent claim with LLoyds for 5 policies for which i believe i was missold PPI for and which stem back to 1999 onwards.
As i had no original policy information/documents relating to these policies i enquired and they confirmed that i had indeed had 5 policies with them and that they would send me a claims form which i duly completed and returned.
Since then I recieved 2 telephone calls asking to discuss the claim, Both at time when i was at work therefore i asked them to ring back at alternative time.
I wasn't sure what the purpose of this call was but they never contacted me again until this morning when i recieved my decision letter.
They have stated in the letter that loan 1 was upheld and that due to them no longer having any detailed records relating to the loan and in the absence of them they have stated "in a genuine attempt to resolve your complaint our offer for this loan is equal to our average compensatory payment, we believe that an average payment methid in cases such as yours is fair and reasonable" they have therefore stated a payment of £1015 + 8% interest less tax =£1615.
On all the other 4 loans which go back to c 1999 they have stated that they have considered all aspects of the suitability of the policy including value for money/refinanced or repaid loans and that i was made aware of the optional nature of the PPI policy and that the PPI didn't improve the chances of your loan application being accepted.
I cannot understand how they can pay out on a loan which they have no evidence or documentation for but defend the 4 for which i was missold?
Could you someone advise where i stand in terms of what i should do next in terms of rejecting their offer?
Is this standard practice for banks to rebuff claims offering a small degree of compensation?
Any advice as to how best i proceed would be much appreciated?
Comment