MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

[Angry Cat]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

My comment leclerc, was in relation to complex cases;
taking action against a creditor, can become time barred.
http://www.hclaw.co.uk/articles.asp?articleid=4

Not really a problem though if one has a valid counter-claim and;
a good lawyer.

IMHO, the FOS take far too long investigating...

[pompeyfaith]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

Can I clarify this with you are PT, if there are multiple loans and one is paying off another loan does the first loan become time barred since they are both interconnected?

None of mine ever did and some of those were inter-connected and some not as I settled early but got redress on all 9 of them going back to March 1999.

As for AC's comments I agree 2.5 yrs and two wrong offers is far to long and it would not have been settled now had it not been for the excellent work of this forum calculating the right amount and putting those figures to the bank and fos.

[pt2537]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

its also worth noting that, PPI can lead to irredeemable unenforceability under a regulated agreement

Look at London North Securities vs Meadows.

Not all people become aware of this either

[Angry Cat]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/ar...5&in_page_id=2

http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/...CA2006/unfair/

[righty]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

I lost any sense of humour relating to CMCs screwing people out of hundreds or thousands of pounds for nothing in return a long time ago.

So you may be different and you may have morals, but I don't know you, and I will do my utmost to protect consumers who come here for help being 'syphoned' off to CMCs we know nothing about.

Yes you have done a few videos, not earth shattering, interesting to see your view as a solicitor. It doesn't mean I automatically trust you and know you.

So go and get your MOJ licence, get some evidence and earnyourself clients by having a damn good reputation. You are not advertising here.

Well I do & for whats its worth IMHO he's be trusted As for it being easy peasy to claim PPI it aint not if you want to maximize your claim it aint AND if you wnat to overcome their tactic of using the JR to stop all claims

The JR is NOT about the validity of claims but about the FSA's powers & nowt else

[TUTTSI]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

There is a very good chance that PPI was included in that 2nd loan and they do not even know it.

Lets face most consumer will sign what ever is put under there noses without them reading the small print.

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/ar...5&in_page_id=2 That is incredible, lending at it's worst I would say.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/...CA2006/unfair/

[righty]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

its also worth noting that, PPI can lead to irredeemable unenforceability under a regulated agreement

Look at London North Securities vs Meadows.

Not all people become aware of this either

Yup its quoted in the POC thats what I'm going for refund of all payments made AND damages equivilent to % paid + damages equivilent to contractual compound intrerest for having the 'loan' of the money + 8% CC

[TUTTSI]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

So based on this and going to the FOS and only getting the return of the premium and a bit of interest at 8% the consumer is missing out big time.:tinysmile_aha_t:

Yup thats what I'm going for refund of all payments made AND damages equivilent to % paid + damages equivilent to contractual compound intrerest for having the 'loan' of the money + 8% CC

[righty]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

I agree with Angry Cat.

And I apologise if I have come across a little harsh on this thread. I hope you understand why.

Ame
xx

I don't
The guys been nothing but be upfront at every stage. As to why he's setting up a seperate company thats a business decision between him & his gaffer & none of our business IMHO

Sorry If I seem a bit harsh:tinysmile_aha_t:

[NLP]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

They get a little precious on this forum when the nasty men and women who work for a living get involved.

Darn those capitalist bleeps.

Power to the people..... (he says in the voice of wolfie smith)

[righty]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

So based on this and going to the FOS and only getting the return of the premium and a bit of interest at 8% the consumer is missing out big time.:tinysmile_aha_t:

That's correct When its no longer the subject of ongoing litigation (& assuming we win) I'll post the POC for all to see

[EXC]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

As to why he's setting up a seperate company thats a business decision between him & his gaffer & none of our business IMHO

Well not really.

''Depending on feedback I may simply leave setting up the claims arm until later or not at all!''

Legal Beagles Consumer Forum - View Single Post - MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

[righty]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

Well not really.

''Depending on feedback I may simply leave setting up the claims arm until later or not at all!''

Legal Beagles Consumer Forum - View Single Post - MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

Yes really! He expressed a thought as to why he's already stated the reason it depends on feedback

[EXC]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

Yes really! He expressed a thought as to why he's already stated the reason it depends on feedback

Never mind.

[Angry Cat]

Re: MOJ removal of CartoonBankers by Alex Woods

If, I were you, which of course I am not. And, unlike you I am not an admitted member of the Law Society.
Common sense would tell me not to set up the claims arm.

Your obvious expertise, would be better channelled by providing specialist PPI legal advice through your firm!

As stated prior, the general consumer distrusts CMC's: cost

Please, bear in mind that you could even end up with a 'big feather' in your legal cap.

My comments relate only to complicated PPI cases, of which there are many and, there could be many more.

by Amethyst:
I agree with Angry Cat.
And I apologise if I have come across a little harsh on this thread. I hope you understand why.
Ame
xx

Looks like there is now a storm in a tea cup?

IMHO, Alex is doing a brilliant job.
Pity, that there are not more like him.